The BBC Betrays Britain, and Iraq: 2

. Hazhir Teimourian has serious worries about BBC World Affairs Editor John Simpson’s recent book, ‘The Wars Against Saddam: Taking The Hard Road To Baghdad’, which the Kurdish commentator on Middle Eastern affairs reviewed for the Literary Review (offline at the moment) this month.

Having blamed Simpson’s account for giving Saddam an easy ride, and accused him of blaming the UK and US far too much over deaths caused by UN sanctions, Teimourian points out the preponderance of Shia victims, and states ominously, ‘That was not a mistake’. He says that during the time of sanctions the mortality rate among children in the Kurdish-controlled North of Iraq (also subject to sanctions) actually fell and that

‘Simpson’s explanation that they (UN sanctions) stopped the importation of water-sanitation equipment is simply not true’

He doesn’t stop there. His most interesting comments are about Simpson’s attitude towards Saddam’s regime:

‘In several places, Simpson irritates by expressing gratitude to top Ba’thists who helped obtain visas for the BBC. By describing them as ‘cultured’ or ‘gentle’ (was Goering acceptable, then, because he hoarded paintings?), he invites us to believe that they bore no responsibility for any of the bestial acts committed by their security forces that Simpson himself describes so well elsewhere in the book.

One such man- and Simpson, incredibly, tried to bring him to Britain as an asylum-seeker after the war- is Saddam’s last foreign minister, Naji Sabri. After telling us how much he likes Sabri, he tells us that Sabri once saved his career as a junior civil servant by denouncing his own brother as a traitor. In return for this service, on top of saving his job, Sabri was exempted from taking part in the firing squad. His poor father was not. Sabri went on to serve Saddam so faithfully that he was eventually made a minister.’

Teimourian begins the conclusion to his review by saying:

‘These shortcomings are serious failures of judgement.’

No doubt these ‘serious failures of judgement’ have helped fuel the BBC bias in their coverage of the Iraq conflict and explain why so many journalists (Guerin, Frei, Hawley, Omar, Gilligan and many others) would express anti-US/UK opinion, and even drop apologetic hints for Saddam, without fearing the reaction of their managers.

Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The BBC Betrays Britain, and Iraq: 2

  1. The Commissar says:

    The Beeb totally ignored/buried Bush’s money quote on the Libya situation, when he referred to “otherwise unwelcome consequences” for rogue nations that defy the world community.


  2. Susan says:

    Massive psychiatric intervention needed at BBC headquarters. Now. These people are delusional. They need help.


  3. londonbear says:

    Uttert crap libelling one of the best journos in print and on screen. Criticism from an unknown and presumably right-wing supporter of Bush Truth hurts xenophobes like you. Stop wasting your time wanking in the wind and if you have concerns report the BBC to the independent watchdogs, then report how they laugh your co,plaints out of court.


  4. ed thomas says:

    Here we go again Londonbear. If you bother to follow up my source- Hazhir Teimourian- you would find a respectable journalist expert in Middle Eastern affairs who I report here mostly verbatim.

    It can’t be libel to report what Simpson has actually said in a book he has written- and the only argument can be with my inferences, or Teimourian’s. I think you should just accept that your idols at the Beeb know less than you think and that their critics- often old journalistic hands themselves- know more than you imagine.