The few BBC apologists that do venture from the bunker really are getting desperate.
Like a compo-on-legal aid slapper trying to spin a rape trial from an imagined boob brush in a crowed tube train (when working), they emerge to try and wangle some silly point of order once in a blue moon, and even if valid ineptly, and in so doing merely emphasis that 99.9999% of the critiques here are incontrovertible and valid.
Unlike the 99.9999% of views as news that the £3.6B national broadcast propaganda machine mis-issues daily as ‘fact’.
Pounce, I think that Tescos looks suspiciously like the its the one near to my work. If so, you can be sure I will use it more now, unless they cave in to the Islamists demands, in which case I will boycott them!
Radio 4 ‘Desert Island Discs’* indicates political ingrown toenail stuff as guest R. Harris mentions that both he and Beeboid ‘Today’s J. Naughtie are each married to BBC-NUJ producers at ‘Newsnight’.
Richard ‘mong’ Bacon just did a classic, talking to some bloke who wrote a book on John Lenon Bacon said that the “book was almost as long as the Bible” and when the author said “and as truthful” Bacon laughed and said “not very then”
Now I’m not a god squad member so I think the bible is a pile of crap anyway, but so is the Koran, but I can’t imagine Bacon ever saying a similar thing about the Koran.
Hoe typical that the BBC leads off by telling us that George Osborne has got it wrong and that the worlds greatest economist (Postman Pat) has got it right.
Now I have to accept the fact that my assessment of the above may be biased because of the story. Yet taking that into account which article is the one you’d expect to see written by an impartial world reknowned news agency?
There was actually an excellent documentary on BBC2 this evening.
Ian Hislop’s Age of Do-Gooder, very informative and balanced. It was a very different approach to history, with excellent and informed talking heads. And considering the topic not all that preach. Ian’s presentation beats Andrew Marr’s anyday.
I found the topic to be very preachy, and noticed that every time closer examination of his subject’s dreams made things look a bit closer to light fascism, he shied away and played the morality card again.
(Excluding the segment about the reformation of the Civil Service, that is.)
I liked the bit were he had the Scottish Romantic critique Robert Owens utopia. This gave the programme a bit of balance and Hislop generally agreed with many unfashionable points such as welfare dependency.
diggJun 6, 21:09 Weekend 6th June 2026 And this is how Muslims will try to take over power in the UK using the racist card etc, unless…
diggJun 6, 20:56 Weekend 6th June 2026 Suggest he takes a look at the proportions of each group in clink for violent crimes and it might explain…
NiborJun 6, 20:53 Weekend 6th June 2026 Yesterday James O’ Brein said that Hampshire Police stop and search Black people 5 times more than white which proves…
Emmanuel GoldsteinJun 6, 20:36 Weekend 6th June 2026 On GB News, The Saturday five, Trey couldn’t understand why black men are stopped and searched more than white men…
moggiemooJun 6, 19:45 Weekend 6th June 2026 They don’t have to be but I think they are.
tomoJun 6, 19:45 Weekend 6th June 2026 https://youtu.be/qGpu81BPiLY https://twitter.com/Artemisfornow/status/2063160513974984736
NiborJun 6, 19:28 Weekend 6th June 2026 BBC Radio 4 Political Thinking interviewing Hermer . A soft interview as you would expect and questions dodged. Hermes mentioned…
Like INBBC, Channel 4 hates the English Defence League, and has a political soft spot for ‘radical Islam’, i.e. Islamic jihadists:
“Radical Muslims given Channel 4 slot ”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/8165311/Radical-Muslims-given-Channel-4-slot.html
The few BBC apologists that do venture from the bunker really are getting desperate.
Like a compo-on-legal aid slapper trying to spin a rape trial from an imagined boob brush in a crowed tube train (when working), they emerge to try and wangle some silly point of order once in a blue moon, and even if valid ineptly, and in so doing merely emphasis that 99.9999% of the critiques here are incontrovertible and valid.
Unlike the 99.9999% of views as news that the £3.6B national broadcast propaganda machine mis-issues daily as ‘fact’.
Pounce, I think that Tescos looks suspiciously like the its the one near to my work. If so, you can be sure I will use it more now, unless they cave in to the Islamists demands, in which case I will boycott them!
Radio 4 ‘Desert Island Discs’* indicates political ingrown toenail stuff as guest R. Harris mentions that both he and Beeboid ‘Today’s J. Naughtie are each married to BBC-NUJ producers at ‘Newsnight’.
(*Repeat Friday 9 am.)
I was out at work this morning and I swear I’ve never been so cold (north Kent) even when down in the Falklands many years ago.
Global warming, my arse.
Richard ‘mong’ Bacon just did a classic, talking to some bloke who wrote a book on John Lenon Bacon said that the “book was almost as long as the Bible” and when the author said “and as truthful” Bacon laughed and said “not very then”
Now I’m not a god squad member so I think the bible is a pile of crap anyway, but so is the Koran, but I can’t imagine Bacon ever saying a similar thing about the Koran.
With the surname Bacon I wonder if he would be allowed to even the hold the Koran without someone taking ‘offense’?
Hoe typical that the BBC leads off by telling us that George Osborne has got it wrong and that the worlds greatest economist (Postman Pat) has got it right.
How the bBC provides a dumbed down news reporting service.
bBC version
Iran says nuclear programme was hit by sabotage
Fox version:
Mystery Surrounds Cyber Missile That Crippled Iran’s Nuclear Weapons Ambitions
Now I have to accept the fact that my assessment of the above may be biased because of the story. Yet taking that into account which article is the one you’d expect to see written by an impartial world reknowned news agency?
I rest my case.
There was actually an excellent documentary on BBC2 this evening.
Ian Hislop’s Age of Do-Gooder, very informative and balanced. It was a very different approach to history, with excellent and informed talking heads. And considering the topic not all that preach. Ian’s presentation beats Andrew Marr’s anyday.
I found the topic to be very preachy, and noticed that every time closer examination of his subject’s dreams made things look a bit closer to light fascism, he shied away and played the morality card again.
(Excluding the segment about the reformation of the Civil Service, that is.)
I liked the bit were he had the Scottish Romantic critique Robert Owens utopia. This gave the programme a bit of balance and Hislop generally agreed with many unfashionable points such as welfare dependency.