Had to laugh at this item (7.17am) on Today this morning. It suggest the RADICAL news that the big orange thing in the sky – the Sun – might actually affect weather on the Earth. I know, I know, who would have figured that one, huh? Anyway, our dear friend Richard Black was on hand to quickly point out that whilst the Sun may help us predict UK winters, this has no effect in any way on the very real danger of …Man Made Global Warming. (Actually, he’s right in one way, since AGW doesn’t exist, nothing can have an impact on it!) It was the speed of his comment that was entertaining, he was clearly determined that no one out there might have a second or two to conclude that it is the Sun, that vast body at the heart of our Solar System, that is the major determinant of our planet’s weather. And that might unravel the hysterical but lucrative fantasy of AGW.
THERE’S ALWAYS THE SUN…
Bookmark the permalink.
They are quite clearly getting their ducks in a row so that colder Northern Hemisphere winters can be explained as being entirely consistent with global warming.
So let me get this straight. The sun’s output can affect local weather patterns but has no effect on overall global temperatures? I call bullshit.
I too heard this and laughed at the “no effect on man made global warming” comment.
I believe this comes from our Meteorolgical Office. It would be interesting to know if the “no effect …” is in their report, or whether it has been added by Mr Black.
Today were worried about the potential reducing in size of the pumpkins for this years Hallowe`en.
Think Black or Harrabin might have got that big orange thing up there confused with a shrinking pumpkin?
In any case, worry like hell!
Maybe the shrinkage of the sun/pumpkin is in inverse proportion to the size of Evan Davis wallet!
That`s my Faeces to be written for the University of Media City,Salford then?…
Coronal Mass Ejections regularly affect the weather here. Big rain storms and temperature fluctuations occur within a few hours. In NYC, you can practically set your watch by it.
The AGW aka Climate Change scam, has now moved out from the so-called scientific phase, and is now well entrenched in the political arena.
All the enabling tax policies that will allow even more taxation on the spurious carbon emissions racket, are already in place. To remove them will require a revolution, as taxes once imposed, are nigh impossible to reverse unless there is a revolution, and all the old parties are dismembered.
So how to stop the process?
The AGW scam is essentially a Leftist/Marxist power grab to control the population via impoverishment and social control. This ruling elite is embedded in the media and academia, and has total control of both.
As in chess, we have to knock out the pawns. Once they are whittled down, the major piecessuch as the rooks bishops – local councils, then our local Westminster government. Only then will king EU be exposed.
“Dr Adam Scaife, from the Met Office, one of the study’s authors, said: ‘Our research establishes the link between the solar cycle and winter climate as more than just coincidence.”
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2047338/Back-vengeance-Scientists-say-suns-11-year-cycle-shows-Arctic-freeze-return-winter.html#ixzz1aLSiBcSy
Last year we had
“Lockwood demonstrates link between low sun and low temps”
Yet 3 years ealier he wrote
“No Sun link’ to climate change [Tuesday, 10 July 2007}
“This should settle the debate,” said Mike Lockwood
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/04/14/lockwood-demonstrates-link-between-low-sun-and-low-temps/
These “studies” have not proved anything. They are just plagerism of studies done long ago. He has not established a link between solar cycles and winter temperatures that has been known for years.
“70-90 years oscillations in global mean temperature are correlated with corresponding oscillations in solar activity. Whereas the solar influence is obvious in the data from the last four centuries, signatures of human activity are not yet distinguishable in the observations.”[1991]
K.Lassen
Danish Meteorological Institute, Solar-Terrestrial Physics Division,
http://www.tmgnow.com/repository/solar/lassen1.html
And on the BBC Luboš Motl notes:
“Richard Black of BBC writes that the authors “emphasize” that this finding can have no consequences for “global warming”, something that appears at the end of the Nature abstract as well. Wow. It’s pretty impressive what preposterous propositions zealous and biased people are ready to write down in their effort to defend the indefensible (including their indefensible grants).”
http://motls.blogspot.com/2011/10/cold-uk-winters-from-low-solar-activity.html
The Met Office again treating us like idiots.
Now wouldn’t it be stange if we don’t get a nasty winter?
“Some people say that the mechanism above should indicate that the 2011-2012 winter in the U.K. will be cold once again. I am a bit skeptical about this assertion, especially because the Sun began to be pretty active in recent months or a year.”
http://motls.blogspot.com/2011/10/cold-uk-winters-from-low-solar-activity.html
Yet it is a no win for us whatever the weather if it is mild we will be back to Global Warming, if not we will be told that the Met Office were right. I am really becoming sick of the dishonesty.
It really was desperate stuff. So the sun can effect the northern hemisphere and cause the temperature to drop, but it cannot effect the rest of the earth and doesn’t change overall global temperatures!
or
2 + 2 = 5
Pah. Effect, affect… A gift for Scez.