I am sure Harriet Harman would not want to be affiliated with this thread! The floor is yours….
MID WEEK OPEN THREAD…
Bookmark the permalink.
Search Biased BBC
Recent Comments
- Guest Who April 18, 2024 at 11:28 am on Midweek 17th April 2024And this is key. Whatever the ‘result’, toads like Toenails, Pesto, KGM, Beff will be trying to, push the narrative...
- Mrs Kitty April 18, 2024 at 11:25 am on Midweek 17th April 2024As long as needed to get him thrown out.
- Guest Who April 18, 2024 at 11:23 am on Midweek 17th April 2024#28Gate was at first a ‘secret’ but most BBC efforts that need verifying are behind FOI exemptions.
- moggiemoo April 18, 2024 at 11:22 am on Midweek 17th April 2024Or right click and preview image, it opens up an overlay on the same tab.
- tomo April 18, 2024 at 11:22 am on Midweek 17th April 2024https://twitter.com/banthebbc/status/1780878456483455113
- MarkyMark April 18, 2024 at 11:22 am on Midweek 17th April 2024Paused - so will start up when not being looked at - see Syrian war - "Scotland’s only gender identity...
- Zelazek April 18, 2024 at 11:18 am on Midweek 17th April 2024Is Scotland turning ... sensible? Two stories on the BBC today. Scotland's only gender identity clinic is to stop prescribing...
- MarkyMark April 18, 2024 at 11:16 am on Midweek 17th April 2024“We want the public to be at the heart of this, which is why next year we will conduct a...
- MarkyMark April 18, 2024 at 11:13 am on Midweek 17th April 2024[img]https://i.postimg.cc/j2tVL8S7/image.png[/img] resized using https://postimages.org/web
Categories
agw anti-American anti-conservative anti-Israel anti Israel. pro Palestinian Antisemitism BBC - sickeningly biased at all times. BBC agenda BBC bias bbc bias and balance. bbc bias by omission BBC censorship BBC Question Time BBC selectivity bias Biased BBC climate change dhimmis general thread immigration Islam israel Mark Mardell obama obama bias Obamalove open thread pro-labour pro-palestinian pro EU pro Hamas pro Islam pro Labour bias pro Obama PRO OBAMA AT ALL COSTS. pro Obama BBC agenda question time question time live Richard Black save gordon. USA politics US economy US News US politics US presidential elections
Got to love how the bbC reports the news:
UKIP calls for HQ swastika removal
So on reading that headline, is the UKIP HQ adorned with…Swastika’s? You’d think so from reading the above: Here is what the story is actually about
Swastikas carved into a county council building have been branded “potentially offensive and upsetting” by someone demanding to know why they are there. The carvings on Chelmsford’s County Hall, built between 1928 and 1939, were made shortly before World War Two.
The bBC, the so called impartial news org which while bending over for every terrorist under the sun, has no problem inventing stories in which to disparage those they despise.
The headline doesn’t say that, has it been stealth edited?
Last updated 12:47 i think.
Thank you pounce, I see it now.
I must have found a different page.
Heres the headline I saw:
Essex County Council HQ swastikas should be removed says UKIP group
Over the last 3 years inside Syria over 130,000 people have been killed. That figure is actually is around 30K more than all the people killed by Israel since its birth in 1948. That includes the war of independence when 5 Arab nations (Egypt,Lebanon,Syria,Jordan and Iraq. With troops from Saudi Arabia and Yemen involved. ) invaded Israel with a mission statement of wiping out the jews once and for all.
The wars of 1956,1967,1973, the invasion of Lebanon in 1982, 2005, the invasion of Gaza, the Intifada all the drone strike’s and the rest and yet the bBC feels fit to report this as headline news:
Israeli troops ‘using excessive force’ in West Bank
“Israeli forces are using excessive and reckless force in the occupied West Bank, Amnesty International says.
More than 40 Palestinians were killed in the past three years and the rate of killings rose significantly in 2013, a report by the human rights group says.”
Wow, 40 pals (Most terrorists) as opposed to 130,000 and the bBC reports how AI is bitching a good one. So I did a quick search on the bBC news website using Amnesty International
as the parameter . for the whole of 2014, I received 3 hits regards AI and Syria. All were about how bad the UK was/is for not taking in more Syrian refugees, Nothing about the either the rebels or the Syrian government and their blood lust. (remember 130,000 dead) Yet to both the bBC and Ai Israel is the evil country ehre.
The bBC (Along with AI) the reason why anti-Semitism is rife in the UK
Drip drip drip, the trailer for bBC local radio’s World War One Stories next week features a paperboy delivering the Times with headline “War Declared”. The paperboy, shall we say is not what one would have expected the average paper boy to have looked like in 1914…..
To wind me up some more it was immediately followed by more inclusiveness with a cbeebies trailer ….
Regions may have varied…
The boy was a tad bit early for Windrush.
I think I know what this means. It is the same when you challenge a liberal over the “endless waves of immigrants” since 1066..
Simple questions like who were they and where from in the 11th 12 th 13th 14th 15th etc centuries reduce them to incoherent rage.
Idiots. Liberals lie.
”The paperboy, shall we say is not what one would have expected the average paper boy to have looked like in 1914.”
Do you have a link, does he look like Carmen Miranda ?
On one level it’s quite amusing, ” His eyes full of wonder and curiosity, wanting to learn more about the First World War”, yeah right !! usually they have vapid expressions. On another level it’s quite malevolent, the multicultural propaganda and disinformation.
Stupid BBC think there were family hatchbacks in WW1 too. And you’re right, blacks do have a sort of dumb, vapid expression. Because they’re so stupid. Not as evolved.
Absolutely nothing to do with racism, the point is that WW1 is not this young chaps history, unlike the majority of this country he does not have 8 Great Great grandfathers, 4 Great grandfathers or even two Grandfathers who may have fought in the horrific conflict.
For me the bBC is cheapening my fore-bearers sacrifices and this young chap is being used as pure tokenism.
I cannot work you out. Are you taking the piss or do you really mean it ? We all know Brims is an arsole and should be banned from this site.
Les, that’s not a criticism, just a mere passing observation, they’ve got cold dead eyes, like that of a shark.
Exhibit A
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-26357007
Sorry pressed report in error. But WTF? Really are they on drugs making this or what. What is the relevance of it supposed to be.
Sorry folks completely inappropriate but just watched the most shockingly Left-wing biased interview between metro-trendy lanky leftie Jon Snow and that smug, unfunny Lefty prat Steve Coogan. It was simply the most biased pro-Marxist footage I’ve ever seen. Both Snow and Coogen were defending Harriet Harman and saying things like ‘isn’t it best that the public should just ignore the Daily Mail…’ etc. Unbelievable! It’s terrible that we have such left-wing extremist news channels. No wonder so many are brainwashed in this country.
They may have defended the champion of kiddie fiddler rights but all that has been pissed against the Wendy house by this:
Hewitt ‘sorry’ over paedophile group
At a stroke, all the defending done by the left for Harman has gone down the arsehole of civil liberties.
Hewitt’s apology is significant in that it not only ramps up pressure on Harman (who apparently lied when she said PIE had been marginalised by the time she had arrived – documents seem to show that it hadn’t been),
…but it ramps up pressure on the BBC who now need to explain, fully, why this story (now legitimised by Hewitt’s apology) was censured by them.
It looks like another censorship issue, but I am sure that the middle-class Arts and Humanities morons at the BBC only find things out if someone on a committee has read the Guardian, there is evidence from a seminar, that the morons can be pig ignorant about an issue that they have only lazily read bits about, in the Guardian.
Maybe CEOPS might want to look at their laptops if that truly is their stance.
I mean…if I whistled a Gary Glitter song whilst dressed in a stained shellsuit and string vest underneath…wouldn`t the BBC and Guardian PaedoPies want me re-educated?
Or would they simply give me the keys to the creche as of old?…
It is probably very counter productive. The more Snow and Coogan bleat on about the DM the more most people stop listening to them.
Not so easily led as our liberal masters would like to believe.
You would expect two paedophiles to tell each other that they are angry with the Daily Mail over this issue.
I saw that, through slitty eyes – Jon Snow is awful – always pushing the leftie stance for which he is notorious, and for all he is worth. Be it this, or climate change, Snow is always there, pushing his own agenda. Nasty little shit. Him AND his socks and ties.
Coogan’s argument, if you can call it that, seemed to be that as the Daily Mail ‘supported Hitler’ in the ’30’s then nothing written in it since is true. Classic Alinsky.
What he failed to mention was that the Mirror, Record, Manchester Guardian and many other newspapers were enamoured with both Mussolini and Hitler until reality bit them, or Uncle Joe of course.
It was a childish performance from a mediocre talent. No wonder Snow had to keep leaping to the defence of Harman.
Even the Guardian doesnt support that view or didn’t at least.
http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/dec/06/dailymail-oswald-mosley
Coogan and the BBC are only interested in highlighting abuse if the perpetrators are Conservative (Tories) or morally ‘conservative’ (RC Church).
As British political class (inc BBC-NUJ) campaign for access of 80 million Turkish Muslims into E.U, and for x-millions of them to get into U.K:-
“Bystander ‘executed’ with sub-machine gun after being caught in Turkish gang feud”
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/bystander-executed-with-submachine-gun-after-being-caught-in-turkish-gang-feud-9158286.html
“Thousands across Turkey call for Erdogan’s ouster:
Audio Recording surfaces discussing hiding stolen millions”
– See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/02/thousands-across-turkey-call-erdogans-ouster-audio-recording-surfaces-discussing-hiding-stolen-millions.html/#sthash.qZTzy0D8.dpuf
Lee Rigby’s killers should have gone on the run for 30 years, got a permission slip from Tony Blair and then come back – no charges, no trial.
-and be interviewed on INBBC by Moazzam Begg?
I was watching Tango man (Hain) this morning talking crap about how the letter was only valid for when it was delivered. That being the case why did the prosecution collapse. Relevant to me as someone I was in basic training with was injured in the Hyde Park bombing.
INBBC-NUJ/INBBC- Arabic: propagandise for Al Jazeera-Qatar-Muslim Brotherhood; and censor ‘Daily Mail’.
INBBC-NUJ/INBBC-Arabic propaganda line:-
“Solidarity day for al-Jazeera journalists held in Egypt”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-26371658
‘Daily Mail’:-
“BBC’s censorship of paedophilia scandal ‘reveals its left-wing bias’: Corporation accused of refusing to report story to protect the Labour party”
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2567110/BBCs-censorship-paedophilia-scandal-reveals-left-wing-bias-Corporation-accused-refusing-report-story-protect-Labour-party.html#ixzz2uYljfaIi
The Daily Mail is getting there, but they still have not probed the BBC about decisions made by environmental activists at that BBC Climate Change seminar, which influenced the censorship of science, scientists and scientific debate. The media censorship over this issue is forcing Astronomers and other Scientists touching on Climate science, to produce their own journalism, so it cannot go on for much longer.
For BBC-NUJ trade union branches which support U.K entry of E.U (and entry of Turkey to E.U):-
” EU politics: in or out, and nothing in between ”
http://eureferendum.com/blogview.aspx?blogno=84747
Which is why Cameron’s position is so devious and dishonest. He knows this and persists in trying to fool us into a “renegotiation” .
The EU will do anything, literally anything to keep us in. Except renegotiate. So be warned. Without us it collapses. This is really what we are not being told.
I bet the BBC does not refer to the front page of Friday’s Sun in its reviews of the newspapers. The headline is across the whole front page is “Labour chiefs : It’s OK to have sex with 10-yr-olds”
…..Exclusive – Sun exposes full horror of paedophile plan
…..why Patricia Hewitt was forced to apoligise, pages 4 and 5
This is the first time the Sun has waded into the 3 Labour Stooges controversy ? So, expect the BBC to muffle it.
Strange that you should day that…guess what? No Sun on the BBC papers.
Sky have no problem with the story
The paper is shown on the BBC website at the moment – but no comments about it.
(It is image 7 of 12 I believe so you have to look for the front page)
and it was not mentioned in any of the reviews of the papers in the Today programme
There has been some controversy about a radical Islamic preacher hiring Legoland for a day out with Muslim families from his foundation. Apparently after receiving numerous threats from groups or persons described as ‘far-right’, Legoland decided to cancel this event.
On the last line of the BBC article telling us about this we’re told:
The Muslim Research and Development Foundation is chaired by cleric Haitham al-Haddad who has been described by some newspapers as an “extremist preacher”, something Mr al-Haddad denies.
This raised my eyebrows.
The BBC is a media outlet in its own right. Why is it taking a description given out by other newspapers to mean anything to its own readers? Whatever are the sources that those newspapers are using are also available to the BBC, so why aren’t they reporting from that?
Instead they skim over this, pushing it aside, to make the denial by this Islamic scum appear justified.
So I did a little search on Google to see what has been told about him.
Wikipedia gives us
Controversial remarks
In 2001, Haitham al-Haddad allegedly said “I will tell you the truth about the fight between us and Jews who are the enemies of God and the descendants of apes and pigs”.[8] He later said that “this is the translation of what has been attributed to me” and that it had been incorrectly translated from Arabic to English.[8]
A journalist for Radio Netherlands Worldwide wrote, “Strikingly, the cleric omits the definite article “the” before “Jews.” In the Arabic language, this omission could be taken to mean he was not speaking about Jews in general but only about those Jews who are enemies of God and descendants of apes and pigs.[8]
In a homophobic article called ‘Standing up against Homosexuality and LGBTs’, Haddad has written of “the scourge of homosexuality”, which he calls a “criminal act” [10]
His attitudes towards women are highlighted by a comment he made in which he declared that “a man should not be questioned why he hit his wife, because this is something between them”.[11] He has claimed that there is a “proper” way of performing FGM,[12] further saying “it is consensus of all the scholars that female circumcision is sunnah [proper]”.[13]
In addition to this he has also claimed that “the most honourable and worthy role for a woman is striving to be a fine wife…this role does not only secure the best for a woman in the hereafter, but also fits perfectly with her natural disposition”[14]
The Harry’s Place website also has an article about him, including videos of interviews he made that show quite clearly what views he has made public.
Here’s a brief description from Brietbart about him.
Haitham Al Haddad, who heads the Muslim Research and Development Fund, has endorsed gender segregation, stated his support for female genital mutilation, and claimed that Jewish people are descended from “apes and pigs”. He has also affirmed his support for the death penalty for people who leave Islam.
He is likely to be one for the first clerics subject to a Terror and Extremist Behaviour Order (TEBO), a proposed civil order that will effectively silence extremist preachers.
Now ask yourself, why hasn’t the BBC made the public aware of this, instead of airbrushing it out of the story?
and for “far right” read ordinary british people.
the bbc really are little shits.
For where the BBC views the world from, ordinary British people are ‘far right’.
Unusually I decided to watch the last half hour of Question Time. I had forgotten just how very poor it is. Embarassingly bad. An audience so obviously stacked with what sounded like Socialist Worker members and Billy Bragg wannabees and a dull panel. Even Melanie Philips sounded tired of it all.
A five minute ( it seemed interminable) Daily Mail hate.
A predictable “immigration is good for us so there” non debate.
Poor stuff. Get rid.
funny enough I did likewise and came to the exact same conclusion. What caught my eye (Actually ear) Was when they were discussion immigration , that spotty haired youth came out with the POV that immigrants don’t use the NHS, don’t use our schools and that all they do is help the country. Yet and a big yet he then proceeded to parrot the Lefts view that anybody who works is a legitimate target and that taxing them (Along with banks,big business) then the sun will shine for the rest of our days in the UK.
Those spots of his were brain blisters emerging into limelight as sent to Newport c/o the BBC.
Poor sod had a greasegun where his skull ought to have been…so time now to pite his like.
To be fair, we`ve not had twenty years of undiluted liberal swill for an education, nor have we had Guardian and NUT shills shitting into Blairs vents and Browns ducts whilst we were supposed to be “learning stuff” in schools.
These dipsticks blame Thatcher for tuition fees and think David Kelly was an ITV quizmaster…and their “Follow the yellow Brick Road” type stunts in pissing and wanking over Thatchers grave leads only to Woolwich High St and Brick Lane.
Poor sods are thick, know-nothings on Media Studies cruises by PC World…pray for them, but have a large stick ready…they HATE reason and argument, and-as Melanie Phillips(PBUH) knows…they get extremely nasty if you do`nt get to the “reset” button in time….
I watched in hope that Melanie Phillips would be on form, she wasn’t. I followed the text comments on the red button, endless anti Mail comment there as well.
Astonished that Philips, responding to the Tory’s account of their spending on the NHS, said ‘have you heard of Mid Staffordshire?’ (Perhaps she had had a brief relapse and gone back to her old lefty ways)
Of course, Anna Soubry was right, everyone knows Mid Staffs was a Labour disaster. But it seems that you can get away with anything on QT – Philip’s sideswipe was met with applause from an audience prepared to believe anything.
Yes, she looked defeated…but has been a tireless warrior for the rest of us, and deserves a few of us to pick up where she is now leaving off.
I see her as our new Shirley Williams , come the end of the liberal fashism we`re seeing in its death throes.
Time now to get ready for the Islamic fashism that already has the liberals head in a sling, if only the thick left could feel up there near that beehive that masquerades as the collective brain of Britain…
The bBC and the anti-Semitic mindset of its staff:
Collaborator film puts Palestinians in Oscars frame
The Palestinian film Omar brings the complexities of the conflict with Israel to this year’s Academy Awards. Nominated in the best foreign language category, it raises the highly sensitive issue of Palestinian collaborators.The movie follows the difficult choices that the title character, a young Palestinian baker, must make after he is involved in the killing of an Israeli soldier and Israeli intelligence agents pressure him to work with them. Omar’s relationships with the girl he loves, his childhood friends and family are all placed in jeopardy. “It’s a love story but it’s also about trust and betrayal under [Israeli] occupation,” says director, Hany Abu Assad, who is in Los Angeles for Sunday’s awards ceremony. “I’m looking at how people behave under extreme, unnatural circumstances.” “Recruiting people to collaborate is kind of a taboo subject and I felt like it was time to open it up because it’s very important,” he goes on. “Not only does it destroy the Palestinian resistance but it also destroys people as human beings. It’s a huge crime in my opinion.”
And yet the bBC remains silent on the blood thirsty nature of Pals around the world be it in Israel, Jordan, Europe, the US or Australia the one thing that links all these Islamic people is their penchant for murderous crime and how the left remain silent on those crimes. Now that is a much bigger crime in anybodys book. Love how the bBC end this article:
However he has been pleased by the response from Palestinians. “Ninety-nine per cent of the reactions of Palestinians are very positive,” he says. “They felt good after the movie – not in the sense that there was a happy ending. But they felt it was worthwhile to watch the film. They lived through this experience and they went out with hope and dignity.”
Muslims the world
talkThreatened to kill you if you don’t respect their dignity, strange mind set seeing as they respect nobody else’s, not even the ones who offer them a new home , (Danish cartoons) feed them or even those idiots who support their cause and end up kidnapped (Alan Johnston) or even worse(Vittorio Arrigoni was murdered by Pals inside Gaza for being…Gay)
BBc Breakfast attempts to push water uphill with a pro-immigration piece. No every poll shows we don’t want immigration. Out of interest I finally got a reply from my MP about the import of the “the most vulnerable Syrians” and my questions about resources, finances, security and other issues went unanswered with a spiel about humanatarism. Funny it took over two weeks to concoct a none answer. Jut as I’m writing this Breakfast reports “armed men” taking over Ukrainian airports. So still not “activists” then?
So, Question Time last night. The one ray of hope was the presence of Melanie Phillips, but even she proved to be less than impressive when facing down her motley opponents on the panel.
Instead we were treated to the delusional, dishonest, entirely party political views of someone called Jay Rayner (who he?) – quite clearly a fully signed-up socialist drone quite prepared to say whatever his politically-correct, common purpose chums in the audience wanted to hear, regardless of the facts – indeed, regardless of reality.
Comrade Rayner shamelessly played the gallery in the best tradition of all gutless, unprincipled lefties, but it was when he launched into a delusional defence of comrade Harperson and her fellow travellers from the NCCL/PIE scandal that his logical disconnect became most alarming.
Rayner used his time on camera to lambast the Daily Mail unequivocally for its ‘attack’ on comrades Harperson, Dromey and Hewitt, claiming the Mail is guilty of publishing child porn (I hope the Mail’s lawyers were watching) as well as managing, just for good measure, to remind the watching public that the Mail ‘supported the black shirts’ in the 30s. Nothing like invoking Godwin’s Law when sanity deserts your argument.
Winning himself a solid round of applause (naturally) for this confused rant he seemed to content to leave the NCCL/PIE scandal locked in the closet marked ‘nothing to see here’.
Nobody on the panel, including (sadly) Ms Phillips, seemed interested in the factual paper trail detailing the catastrophic lack of moral oversight of ‘the gang of three’ during their time in the discredited NCCL – a pity, as any investigative journalist worth their salt must realise there is in this case – for once – a wealth of physical evidence ripe for forensic examination.
Anyone think it likely we’ll be seeing a Newsnight Special or an extended edition of Panorama examining all the available evidence (of which there is a great deal)..?
No. Somehow, I thought not.
Your license fee at work, folks.
I to wonderd who the hell he was .
http://www.theguardian.com/profile/jayrayner
An archetypal shiraz socialist ,but how did he get that gig?
All is explained here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jay_Rayner
Unlike your good self I could not stomach more than 10 minutes of it. But did note that after his despicable description of the DM as ‘todays Peadophile information exchange’ , a challenge from an audience member in support of DM brought at least as much appluase if not more. So there was some representation of the DM’s 4.5 million readers.
description of the DM as ‘today’s Paedophile information exchange’
Did he really say that? It is only a few steps away from saying the Daily Mail should be banned. They do not even try to disguise their fascism do they As Huey Long is supposed to have predicted, the Fascists from now on will call themselves anti-Fascists. All hail the Party!
I’d have thought his remarks are legally actionable ? I don’t know if the DM as a company could have legal status to sue – but maybe the editors ? He is traducing what they stand for.
I notice that the creep went to a private school. The usual parental hypocrisy.
He sure did , and preened himself while he got got an ecstatic round of appluase from that small but vociferous section of the audience that that question time allways seems to attract ( though not by design I’m sure )
And yes those anti -facists do love to ban things dont they , even on here.
Excuse me for saying…..but what an ugly deformed bastard he is.
So the Observers food critic gets a berth on QT. Amazing. Then he uses it to allege that the DM publishes child porn. Serious stuff.
I wonder if he has been to the police with this?
Or is he just a bull5h1t merchant.
There was another clown called Terry Christian that turned up on a Sunday Morning BBC talk show a year or two back to charge the DM with being pro Nazi in the 1930’s (yes that old chestnut).
The BBC seem to be happy with giving air time to anyone wanting to make a dig at the Mail.
The 30’s DM/Nazi ‘chestnut’ was aired by the bBC in a comment on the Red Button during QT last night.
Its an old standard, much like when questioning immigration, the ex pat’s in Spain are always used as a comparison, but they seem to forget that they fund themselves….
Geoff wrote:
“Its an old standard, much like when questioning immigration, the ex pat’s in Spain are always used as a comparison, but they seem to forget that they fund themselves….”
Good point and one that requires more media coverage.
British people who retire abroad do so with their own money, they pay for everything. in other words they are not a drain on their new location.
In contrast, anybody who comes to the Uk receives free medical care, free translation services, free schooling and they are a drain on the British economy.
Agree entirely.
Presumably the Spanish decided to attract this type of ex-pat and saw various advantages in doing so. There is no reason whatsoever why any other country should feel obliged to do the same.
I haven’t been to Spain for some time but I understand that most of the Brits occupy resorts largely created for this purpose. I’m not aware of British people taking over significant areas in, say, Madrid.
I believe somebody mentioned in this blog several weeks ago that Spain makes very few concessions to ex-pats who have chosen to live there. Nor should they.
Contrast that with how little we hear about the Guardian suppressing news about Stalin’s genocidal famine in the Ukraine
“Muggeridge decided to investigate reports of the famine in Ukraine, travelling there and to the Caucasus without obtaining the permission of the Soviet authorities. Reports he sent back to the Manchester Guardian in the diplomatic bag, thus evading censorship, were not fully printed and were not published under Muggeridge’s name. ..
with British newpapers editorial policy, namely not wishing to make waves in Russia in view of the more worrying political situation in Germany, ”
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malcolm_Muggeridge#Moscow)
More nepotism, Jay Rayner = son of Claire Rayner agony aunt, not surprisingly Observer columnist and bBC One Regular.
At least we know where his loyalties lie, he seems to think Polish workers are better than British, “at least they turn up on time” must be nice to be able to afford painters and decorators….
Jay Rayner is a food critic. He would know all about pies…
Was like a George Melly and could almost see the grease and sweat pouring off him.
Wonder if he`s able to do school dinners in Brixton?…maybe Jamie could tell us, seeing as he at least has a CRB to do his stuff I`d imagine.
Did he critique food while his mum just ate loads of it?
More BBC-Democrat apologetics for Obama (and his father):-
“Obama speaks about fatherless childhood”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-26379534
The above is inaccurate: Obama’s childhood wasn’t ‘fatherless’; his father just wasn’t around, he was in Kenya.
Alternative view of Obama’s relationship with his father:-
“2016 OBAMA’S AMERICA Dinesh D’Souza’s Movie with Glenn Beck on GBTV YouTube”
and of course Dinesh D’Souza is now being harassed by Obama’s Justice Department. The most corrupt US administration ever – far worse than Nixon’s unsuccessful attempts to sick the Revenue etc on his political opponents.
News Sniffer reveals how the BBC have edited their on-line article in a way that will save blushes at the Leftist and low circulation (but very popular with BBC staff) newspapar The Guardian.
http://www.newssniffer.co.uk/articles/745832/diff/0/1
This article is from the source ‘bbc’ and was first published or seen on February 27, 2014 13:30
Version 0
‘A Guardian piece in August 1975 was headlined: “Child-lovers win fight for role in Gay Lib”. “Paedophile” was still not a widely used term and the opening line explains it – “one who is sexually attracted to children”.’
2014-02-27 16:30:27 UTC (about 3 hours later)
Version 1
‘In a Guardian piece from 1975 it’s clear “paedophile” was still not a widely used term and the opening line explains it – “one who is sexually attracted to children”.’
I would venture that little further comment is required. Just more evidence that the BBC is institutionally bent.
Sorry, that’s my version 0. What I meant to say (my version 1) is that this deliberate self-censorship provides more evidence that the BBC dishonestly panders to the gay activist lobby and routinely shields its Leftist allies and fellow travellers in the media and politics.
Here’s the link direct to the (now carefully edited) BBC report.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26352378
‘By Tom de Castella & Tom Heyden BBC News Magazine’
So Tom and Tom, why did you remove the reference to the Guardian’s headline “Child-lovers win fight for role in Gay Lib” ?
A stunning read, even from the heavily-edited BBC!
The interview tells you all that you need to know about the “informed choices”, “Non-judgemental” “equal rights and status for childrens feelings” doublespeak we still live with…and how clear too ,that the likes of Hain, Polly were there or thereabouts(note her comment that we`ll all agree with them within a few years, it being the coming wave of liberalism…talk about sheepdips and the willing groupthink of liberal hacks like Toynbee!)
Of course-the house organ of PIE WOULD be the Guardian, whilst those who tried to run the country were getting the Times( when the Guardian and Mirror print unions let them see it)
This whole Tusa/Guardian/Wolmar piece-an EDIT ,mind !-on its own tells you so much about the cesspit we live in now…and who was shovelling Saviles into it , albeit with “culturally and professionally appropriate syntax”. Savile was only themselves after a lunchtime session at the gym!
Shut down the Guardian-and let`s hope some ex PIEmen(bet they did not encourage women for the front bench either) apologise for those Harman/Toynbee links which have brought them such disrepute and discredit.
Come on PIEmen…cut all links with the BBC and the Guardian as well as the Labour Liberal Parties…you should be ashamed of yourselves if you sat affiliated to their Purpose or Agenda!
Beeboid-Guardianista political ‘hero,’ and exposer of national security, Greenwald, supports Islamic jihadist, Moazzam Begg, too:-
‘Jihadwatch’:-
“Glenn Greenwald: Moazzam Begg arrest ‘part of the effort to criminalize Muslim political dissent'”
By Robert Spencer.
[Opening excerpt]:-
“The idea that the British government, which cowers in terror before Islamic supremacists and does everything it can to appease them, is endeavoring to criminalize Muslim political dissent is howlingly absurd. Still, this article is worth reading for the ways in which it illuminates the Leftist/Islamic supremacist mindset.”
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/02/glenn-greenwald-moazzam-begg-arrest-part-of-the-effort-to-criminalize-muslim-political-dissent/comment-page-1#comment-1014839
A step in the right direction??
http://johnredwoodsdiary.com/2014/02/28/decriminalise-the-bbc-licence-fee/
This one ought to run-and would love to hear the likes of Harmans BBC try to tell why not getting a TV Licence must NOT -repeat NOT- be decriminalised!
Maybe we could run a sweepstake on who would argue this…and what excuses they`ll be chruning over for us
My starters for ten?
1.To decriminalise the non-payment of the License fee at this stage might inflame the Scots Nats or Islamic Jihadists.
Don`t ask me why…it just might , that`s all.
2. It would threaten those addicted to paying for their TV Licenses, and put them at risk of withdrawal symptoms. Bit like decriminalising cannabis eh Russell?…oh wait…we seem to have lost the line there…help!
Well done John Redwood!
There is no possible logical way to defend the continued criminalisation of the TV tax.
It is regressive. It is out of date and if you are a liberal lefty how on earth can you defend it? You have tried to decriminalise nearly everything else.
Answer. It is about money. Without it the BBC is toast. They know it we all know it.
Time to be honest about it.
But honesty from a liberal is just something that does not happen.
UKIP call for BBC non-payment to be made a civil not criminal offence.
The revelation that 10% of all criminal prosecutions, 180,000 per year are for non-payment of the BBC license fee is horrifying, said Lord Pearson, the UKIP leader in the House of Lords.
The former leader of UKIP is calling for major reform of the way in which the license fee is protected by turning any non-payment offence from the Criminal Justice system to the Civil system. “It is outrageous that so many people are brought in to the criminal justice system through this means. I believe that non-payment should be treated in the way that parking tickets are.” “It is absurd that the courts are being clogged up by such a minor offence” he said.
Lord Pearson’ Bill received its first reading on the 30th of July.
It is calling for this reform and for the Trustees of the BBC to be elected by the license fee payers.
I believe the second reading is: today 28th of February.
Is it on the BBC?
The reality is that if you are a single mother living on benefits you need a licence to watch TV and WILL be prosecuted for not having one.
If you are a millionaire ‘New Briton’ and granny lives in your house, along with your unmarried brothers and sisters, you can have as many TV sets as you like on one, zero-cost, licence.
It all seems at odds with the Labour lines of the poor and the ‘bedroom tax’, (which they introduced for private renting), and cutting ‘tax-breaks’ for millionaires, (doesn’t a 20% tax on a million pounds produce more than a 20% tax on £10,000? Never could understand socialist economics!).
I can’t help but think that if this was a ‘Sky tax’ the BBC would be all over it.
Couldn’t agree more.
I did smile at your comment, “Never could understand socialist economics!”. Nor do they of course.
Anyway at least we now know where UKIP stand on the BBC tax.
But will I vote for them?
Does Nigel like a pint?
A sacrificial tail-ender (not sure I know, or want to, what a ‘ring-savvy’ Civil Servant may be) as the 300+ mark has been exceeded, but in other news…
http://tradingaswdr.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/clear-for-clare.html
Anyway, ‘…New colleagues at Broadcasting House describe her as firm, but a Good Thing.’
Looking at her CV, and those worked with, there may be a hint as to why she would would be considered to fit right in with Mr. Purnell, etc.
Continuing mass immigration into U.K (as supported by BBC-NUJ branches).
Beeboid EASTON, as usual, represents views of immigrants (his ‘migrants’), well: views of British people, less so well-
“Big increase in net migration to UK”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-26367391
‘Daily Mail’
“Soaring immigration is good, says Cable: Business Secretary mocks Cameron’s failure to control EU influx”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2569103/Net-migration-soars-212-000-year-despite-Camerons-tough-talk-cutting-number-tens-thousands.html
And there’s always this:-
“African migrants* [immigrants]’storm’ Spain’s Melilla-Morocco border”
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-26329018?
* Beeboids, your political dictionary is , of course, wrong, to use the word ‘migrant’ in this context. These African illegal immigrants have no intention of ‘migrating’ back to Africa, like birds do annually. And ‘human rights’ legislation ensures that these Africans stay in the European Union, in ever increasing, unstoppable numbers, and when required, with benefits paid for by European people.
“The Camp of the Saints”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Camp_of_the_Saints
“FARAGE: ‘MAKE PATRIOTISM RESPECTABLE ONCE AGAIN'”
By James Delingpole.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/02/28/Farage-speech-ukip-conference
“Jean Raspail, author of Camp of the Saints:
‘Our civilisation is disappearing'”
http://islamversuseurope.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/jean-raspail-author-of-camp-of-saints.html
Not BBC-related (although they’ll no doubt do their best to exploit the situation):
http://order-order.com/2014/02/28/ukip-lift-old-bnp-slogan/
*facepalm.jpg*
May I recommend as many as can have a look at John Redwood’s blog. http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com. Scroll down a little to see it. He is drawing attention to a proposal by Andrew Bridgen MP to amend the Deregulation Bill to shift the BBC licence fee from a criminal matter to a civil matter like any other household bill. I think this deserves our support; if passed it may have considerable consequences of advantage to our cause.
Oo, still room for one last, wafer-thin Friday fun filler…
http://order-order.com/2014/02/28/sky-news-political-editor-interview-stage-underway/
‘…made it through to interview stage include Sky’s own Joey Jones and Jon Craig and the BBC’s James Landale and Allegra Stratton’
As the market rate talent revolving spiral staircase (Ok, a clever engineering feat) continues apace in the politico-media sphere, I have to say I am really hoping it’s Allegra’s to lose.
For a start it would really make me feel even better every time I drop the SKY ‘please come back’ mailings in the bin, but mostly there’s the fun of figuring out which predictable box-ticking replacement Mr. Katz will bring up the old Newsnight slipway this time round to pay a vast fortune to ‘report’ to six people (at last count).
All you silly people do know that leftism and the media and the film industry and the television industry and politics and political parties and central banks and the finance industry are all controlled by Jews. It is them who give you Muslims as an enemy to rile against whilst protecting themselves who are without any shadow of doubt our real enemy..think about that.
I have and I much prefer, lizard men , Eisenhower’s secret deal with the Gray’s and the montauk conspiracy.
Proponent’s of these fairy tales construct a much more coherent narrative ark.
I thought Charlie Cairoli was dead.
Shalom to you anyway.
I think other web site proprietors should take this site as an model, very clean and wonderful user friendly style and design, let alone the content. You’re an expert in this topic!
Thanks , I have just been searching for information about
this topic for ages and yours is the greatest I’ve
found out till now. However, what about the conclusion?
Are you certain in regards to the supply?