Burnham proves how corrupt the British political system is . The BBC is delighted their boy done good and will now become a new improved face of the Marxists .
I remember when Starmer became leader. I told my brother”heres another I won’t be voting for” – wooden didn’t begin to describe him – dead behind the eyes with no personality. My brother and I reached the political fork in the road during Corbins time, but I still went to see him inaugurated as Mayor of Stevenage. What could I do? he’s my little brother 😆 🤣
I feel Starmer doesn’t care about being loved or hated one little bit; he’s just doing it for the money, like a bailif evicting someone.
He’s clients here? some globalists and the indigenous population the ones being evicted or slowly replaced.
He’ll fight to stay as long as he can, then hand the baton to his replacement, retire and quickly become much more wealthy somehow.
Maybe they’ve tightened the ratchet too fast this time, so Burnham might loosen things here and there for a while, before continuing.
Damn – msm is making look as though TTK is going to be handed the revolver and a whisky tumbler …. But he has no honour so will probably expect the Muslims to throw him off a roof …
Mad Ed chancellor
Jess Phillips home secretary
Nandy foreign secretary
Thangam debonair – defence
Lammy education
Cooper balls attorney general
Kendal media
Streeting energy
Leasbeater – health
Just my little joke ….
Gotta feel for Peter Kyle – sent out to do the rounds Sunday ….
Last week he said the defence thing was an excellent plan – then had to admit he hadn’t seen it – so very Labour …
The chap im posting below regularly delivers well explained / reasoned opinions … here’s one reacting to the Starmer Marxist intention of making their state broadcaster even more dominant … time for a coup i think …
Jim Chimirie米◎
@JChimirie66677
X.com
The BBC Fabricated Trump’s Words. Starmer Wants It Boosted For Fighting Disinformation.
This week, the same government that announced it would ban under-16s from most social media platforms confirmed a second policy. Force Facebook, YouTube and every major platform to algorithmically boost content from the BBC, ITV and Channel 4.
The stated reason is fighting disinformation. The timing makes that justification impossible to take at face value.
The BBC spliced together two separate parts of a Donald Trump speech, delivered an hour apart, to make it appear he had directly told his supporters to march on the Capitol and fight, while cutting the part where he told them to protest peacefully. This was not sloppy editing. It was a constructed sequence designed to produce a false impression of what was said. Trump is now suing the BBC for ten billion dollars. The corporation’s own internal memo, leaked to the Telegraph last autumn, documented the edit alongside a pattern of other failures. Extensive uncritical airtime given to Hamas on BBC Arabic. A rogue unit of activist reporters censoring coverage of the trans debate to fit a predetermined narrative. A report calling car insurers racist that was found to be, in the BBC’s own words, thoroughly wrong. This week it emerged the corporation sacked a presenter for criticising its Gaza coverage while taking no action against reporters who appeared to celebrate the October 7th attacks.
This is the organisation that Starmer wants boosted in the name of trusted information. Not a minor broadcaster with an isolated error. An institution funded by £3.7 billion a year in compulsory licence fees, facing a billion dollar lawsuit for fabricating a world leader’s words, accused of one sided reporting on the most contested conflicts of our time, and now positioned by law to be placed ahead of every independent voice on every major platform in the country.
Put this alongside the under-16s ban and the pattern stops looking like coincidence. One policy restricts what young people can access. The other restructures what everyone sees first, adults included, engineering visibility in favour of the state broadcaster and against the independent platforms where this
government’s record, on Belfast, on Makerfield, on the asylum backlog and on every other documented failure, gets challenged daily by people it cannot easily silence. Bluesky escaped the social media ban despite its own documented child safety failures. The BBC gets promoted despite a documented record of
fabrication. Both decisions share the same logic. Visibility for institutions the government finds comfortable. Restriction for the platforms where it does not.
Lord Young of Acton, the human rights lawyer who founded the Free Speech Union, put it with the right amount of contempt. The Prime Minister has apparently decided that censoring social media should be his legacy, which is strange territory for a former human rights lawyer to choose. It is strange only if you assume the goal was ever free expression rather than managed expression. Nothing in this government’s conduct this month supports that assumption.
A government that needs to legislate prominence for its preferred broadcaster is not protecting the public from disinformation. It is admitting that its preferred broadcaster cannot earn that prominence on the evidence of its own reporting, and has decided to mandate by law what trust no longer provides voluntarily. That is not journalism policy. It is state media privilege written into platform regulation, arriving in the same fortnight as a ban on what sixteen year olds may read, from a government that is rapidly running out of ways to disguise what it is actually doing.
“The BBC spliced together two separate parts of a Donald Trump speech, delivered an hour apart, to make it appear he had directly told his supporters to march on the Capitol and fight”
On the basis that the establishment’s narrative is that the UK has a debt of an unknown amount to unknown persons for the slave trade, how long will it be before we have to pay reparations to Germany for engaging in the second world war (oh and at the same time you could take Churchill off the one bank note that has so little value, that the changes are unlikely to prevent any fraud)
Article in The Guardian re the alleged bombing of an Iranian school with lots of children killed.
In the article they run a piece of video showing the interior of a school classroom with lines of desks. On the left hand side of the scene the desks and benches can be seen to be pristine clean, as the camera pans right the right hand row of desks have large pieces of what looks like shattered concrete lying on the desks in a very orderly fashion. However the surrounding walls are intact and clean so where could this mystery concrete debris have come from? The ceiling is unlikely to be constructed with 3 inch thick concrete, more usually thin plaster, and surely an explosion displacing concrete would surely scatter some timber, roof joists etc? There is no evidence in the video of any debris other that the suspicious chunks of concrete..
To me, it looks as if it has been carefully placed to fit the narrative. The desks and benches in the room, including the ones with debris are also shown in perfect rows despite being pretty flimsy looking, a large violent explosion would have scattered them across the room.
I would deduce that the video has been faked by Iranian actors to implicate and smear the US and I wonder why the investigative powers of the Guardian journalists or their agents involved fail to notice any of this?
Did they mention how the school used to be the headquarters for the missile base and the American intelligence was out of date ?.
No – thought not.
‘The two-story concrete building originally served as the command headquarters for the Seyyed al-Shohada Asif Missile Brigade of the IRGC Navy.’
You won’t see that on the BBC. AI tried to lie to me to say it was when it wasn’t:
‘You are entirely correct to call that out—the BBC did not report that the building was a command headquarters. That specific detail comes from broader military and legal analyses of the incident, not the BBC’s reporting’
I’m 50/50. Everything points to him going tomorrow. It’s his last chance to salvage any perception of doing the honourable thing at all.
But that means nothing to this creature. I still think he might stay on and fight to stay. He is utterly deluded. It will mean the end of all his EU trips and ‘coalition of the willing’ meetings and they are what he lives for.
Plus there is a good chance he will employ a scorched earth policy on his way out and sabotage everything he can for Bodybags.
This week is going to be a cracker. Please hold on Two-Tier. I don’t want it to end quickly. I want to see you humiliate yourself thoroughly before you disappear in disgrace.
The bBC is pre-occupied with the importance of equality yet they are strangely silent now that the Labour Party are lining up another white male leader. Of course the bBC understand the Labour Party, they are one and the same, and they get a free pass. Reform are not so lucky, apparently they are anti-female. The Conservatives; well the bBC cannot comment because it is an off-topic subject, because we know that Conservatives are both racist and sexist. It is lucky that we have such discerning bBC narrativists to bring us what we need to hear.
In light of your possible resignation I would like to point out a non-comprehensive legacy list showing only a few of your achievements.
1. ‘Smashing the gangs’.
2. The over-taxing of businesses
3. Trying to give away the Chagos Islands and making the tax- payer pay for it.
4. Ignoring the grooming gangs, and doing nothing for the victims.
5. Ignoring the genuine concerns of much of the electorate and pushing a ‘far-right’ label on anyone who would raise concerns relating to unchecked and illegal immigration.
6. Not answering any questions during prime ministers QT in house of commons.
7. Souring the UK – US relationship.
8. Attack on pensioners, veterans, farmers………….. etc.
9. Pushing to give 16 year olds the vote.
10. Backing Net-Zero despite the the economic destruction of Industries and many businesses, and the loss of future job prospectives for young people.
I assume you will be looking for a role in the EU relating to EU and International Law. On the ‘Kinnock’ Gravy Train. Hopefully Lord Ali will be giving you and the Mrs some leaving presents (maybe more new glasses for you and more knickers for the Mrs).
Hope you still get some quality time with Andy, Mandy, Tony B, Ang, Ed Millipede and the labour master mind.
PS: You could demonstrate that you are charitable at heart by taking in 1 or 2 migrants like Yvette said you would.
Now that President Trump has chimed in saying TTK is going to- maybe TTK will be more inclined to hang on …. But if he goes – I’d do anything to see him blub ….
When people mention that Burnham got a huge vote in Makerfield they don’t seem to come out with one big statistic.
They say it’s a vote to get rid of TTK but I think that’s only part of it.
The greens got 308 votes and the libdems also got an unreaslistic low vote of 163 which looks like tactical voting to me.
The Labour vote plus the greens and the libdems beat Reform but if it wasn’t for this tactical voting to keep Reform out maybe the 35% votes would have been enough.
If the greens and libdems (national poll of polls have them at 15% and 13%) had their 2 x 10%+ votes Reform probably would have won.
And that’s not taking Restore 6.8% into consideration.
Has anyone on here heard any commentator mentioning the tiny green/libdem vote and said they moved to Labour for this by election.
They only seem to be saying it was to get rid of TTK.
Starmer Plans to Force everyone in the World to “Trust the BBC”. The BBC lead Trusted News Initiative (TNI) will use Censorship of the Truth and Socialist Propaganda to cover-up the crimes of the British State. The British government will give itself emergency powers, with sweeping state surveillance and control of the British people using behavioural science to brainwash the British people to conform to the behaviours required by the state. “Truth is Misinformation, Freedom is Slavery and Diversity is our Strength”: https://dailysceptic.org/2026/06/21/starmer-plans-to-force-social-media-giants-to-prioritise-bbc-content/
The BBC banned these ten comments for spreading misinformation, disinformation and malinformation:
(1) Sir Keir Starmer wants social media to support trusted media like the BBC. I’m not sure which is funnier the BBC being called trusted or Starmer being called Sir.
(2) BBC is disinformation. It should be remembered that George Orwell models his book 1984 on the way the BBC operates.
(3) The BBC is trusted alright… to be most biased, unreliable, disseminators of Leftard propaganda in the entire United Kingdom!
(4) You mean the BBC? The misinformation leaders who knowingly altered an interview with President Trump and now gets to pay millions in libel punishment??? Good idea Starmer
(5) Orwell warned us of this – BBC = BIG BROTHER COMMUNIST
(6) Hey limeys, 1984 was a warning, not an operating manual for the fascist elites.
(7) This is left wing propaganda and everyone knows it. Britain is no longer a democratic or free country.
(8) Put simply, the Marxist/Globalists intend to suppress, repress or burden any media that is not government controlled. How Soviet of them.
(9) Good thing people of vision threw tea into the Boston Harbor a long time ago which led to our establishment of freedom of speech as a fundamental right.
(10) Madame Starmer only wants state controlled media, sorta like Stalin and Pravda.
Elon Musk reposted: ‘X’ is the #1 news app in the UK. This is exactly why the BBC, The Telegraph and other UK legacy media keep pushing negative fake attacks on Elon Musk. They are getting destroyed in the rankings. The British public has rejected them. Legacy media is finished: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2067501678903832812
I know I’m getting advanced in years and I’m worried I might be getting Dementia.
When I watch the news on BBC I’m sure I see things that can’t be true.
Kier Starmer is Prime Minister.
David Lammy is deputy prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Lord chancellor and Secretary of state for Justice.
Rachel Reeves is the Chancellor of the Exchequer.
Yvette Cooper is the Foreign secretary.
Shabana Mahmood is the Home Secretary.
ED. Miliband is the Energy Secretary.
Lisa Nandy is the Culture Secretary.
It looks like:
Jeremy Corbin, Angela Rayner, John Mcdonnell and many more are waiting in the wings for Andy Burnham to be Prime Minister. A man that the Labour Party didn’t even want as an MP.
I must see my Doctor, if I can get an appointment.
Kinell – it’s okay you’re not getting dementia – other wise you’d have posted the same thing twice . Having gone through dementia as a carer ( like so many ) – the ‘memory clinic ‘ where you get assessed for dementia is a gift for anyone who does crosswords …
I’ve realised who TTA will have as chancellor – if not mad ed – it’s that ‘Torsten bell ‘ who has a hatred for old people and can’t wait to get rid of the triple lock and start up pensioners having fights at food banks ….
The financial commentators are saying watch the bond yield on Monday – see if they can push it back up to 5% … – the amount of tax money now being spent on servicing the the existing debt is … obscene ….
An ‘emergency budget ‘ to put up more taxes right now … maybe …
Fedup2Jul 26, 17:09 Weekend 25th July 2026 ‘ because it maintains a veneer of respectability while functioning as a gatekeeper for acceptable opinion.“ – nails it -…
Fedup2Jul 26, 17:07 Weekend 25th July 2026 Somehow we can’t expect any noise about the Islamic attack on queers by labour type MPs …. In the truth…
Emmanuel GoldsteinJul 26, 16:59 Weekend 25th July 2026 I’ve seen loads of ‘errors’ and ‘mistakes’ made by the bbbc but the odd thing is they are without exception…
harry142857Jul 26, 16:50 Weekend 25th July 2026 Massive fire nears Marseille. I reckon we could assist our French amis. Bodybags could send all those dinghies we have…
Richard PinderJul 26, 16:32 Weekend 25th July 2026 [img]https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Podcasts221/v4/84/54/f2/8454f2a2-5b01-7b27-5b6c-582fdf2bdb6c/mza_3897844428372220213.jpg/540x540bb.webp[/img] The BBC’s War on Truth AlterAI: What percentage of BBC News is fake news or misinformation? AlterAI says: The…
tomoJul 26, 16:28 Weekend 25th July 2026 https://twitter.com/i/status/2081238037581754682 Present credibility rating – a clean sweep of negative numbers. I’d be OK with ” I changed my mind”…
MarkyMarkJul 26, 15:21 Weekend 25th July 2026 Diversity with June Sarpong: why are people living with disabilities overlooked by business? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pOEK3vFfh3E The author of ‘Diversify’ examines the…
MarkyMarkJul 26, 14:54 Weekend 25th July 2026 BBC NEWS “Meghan calls Harry ‘a charmer’ during MasterChef Australia appearance” https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckg41vn8x7ko [img]https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSvMjVhRVdnXSL_vE4BoCTmqy84W6PYLWSel1-j0yD8Sw&s=10[/img] The heartwarming tale behind Meghan Markle’s ‘bananas…
MarkyMarkJul 26, 14:52 Weekend 25th July 2026 “… and mould the whole of Europe into a copy of Germany …. a good place to start is to…
I remember when Starmer became leader. I told my brother”heres another I won’t be voting for” – wooden didn’t begin to describe him – dead behind the eyes with no personality. My brother and I reached the political fork in the road during Corbins time, but I still went to see him inaugurated as Mayor of Stevenage. What could I do? he’s my little brother 😆 🤣
I feel Starmer doesn’t care about being loved or hated one little bit; he’s just doing it for the money, like a bailif evicting someone.
He’s clients here? some globalists and the indigenous population the ones being evicted or slowly replaced.
He’ll fight to stay as long as he can, then hand the baton to his replacement, retire and quickly become much more wealthy somehow.
Maybe they’ve tightened the ratchet too fast this time, so Burnham might loosen things here and there for a while, before continuing.
I suspect that Kier doesn’t really appreciate how despised he actually is – nobody in his immediate circle is going to tell him the truth.
Same goes for Miliberk -all surrounded by fawning cretins.
Only a matter of time before “Bodybags” polling numbers have to be dramatically fudged.
Damn – msm is making look as though TTK is going to be handed the revolver and a whisky tumbler …. But he has no honour so will probably expect the Muslims to throw him off a roof …
Nah … he’ll slope off to some EU / Soros gig.
Slime that he is…
Several opportunities present themselves:
1. Special EU Ambassador for Continuing the West’s Proxy War against Russia.
.
2. Re-join the Rockerfeller Trilateral Commission.
3. Go back to editing the magazine of Socialist Alternatives/International Revolutionary Marxist Tendency/Pabloist Trotskyite group.
And anyone who doesn’t know the linkages between the above hasn’t been doing their homework…
Burnham cabinet
Mp for Palestine Mahmoud dep PM
Mad Ed chancellor
Jess Phillips home secretary
Nandy foreign secretary
Thangam debonair – defence
Lammy education
Cooper balls attorney general
Kendal media
Streeting energy
Leasbeater – health
Just my little joke ….
Gotta feel for Peter Kyle – sent out to do the rounds Sunday ….
Last week he said the defence thing was an excellent plan – then had to admit he hadn’t seen it – so very Labour …
I’ve seen the footage of the so called Muslim attacker of Edinburgh.
Put me on the Jury.
NOT GUILTY
The chap im posting below regularly delivers well explained / reasoned opinions … here’s one reacting to the Starmer Marxist intention of making their state broadcaster even more dominant … time for a coup i think …
Jim Chimirie米◎
@JChimirie66677
X.com
The BBC Fabricated Trump’s Words. Starmer Wants It Boosted For Fighting Disinformation.
This week, the same government that announced it would ban under-16s from most social media platforms confirmed a second policy. Force Facebook, YouTube and every major platform to algorithmically boost content from the BBC, ITV and Channel 4.
The stated reason is fighting disinformation. The timing makes that justification impossible to take at face value.
The BBC spliced together two separate parts of a Donald Trump speech, delivered an hour apart, to make it appear he had directly told his supporters to march on the Capitol and fight, while cutting the part where he told them to protest peacefully. This was not sloppy editing. It was a constructed sequence designed to produce a false impression of what was said. Trump is now suing the BBC for ten billion dollars. The corporation’s own internal memo, leaked to the Telegraph last autumn, documented the edit alongside a pattern of other failures. Extensive uncritical airtime given to Hamas on BBC Arabic. A rogue unit of activist reporters censoring coverage of the trans debate to fit a predetermined narrative. A report calling car insurers racist that was found to be, in the BBC’s own words, thoroughly wrong. This week it emerged the corporation sacked a presenter for criticising its Gaza coverage while taking no action against reporters who appeared to celebrate the October 7th attacks.
This is the organisation that Starmer wants boosted in the name of trusted information. Not a minor broadcaster with an isolated error. An institution funded by £3.7 billion a year in compulsory licence fees, facing a billion dollar lawsuit for fabricating a world leader’s words, accused of one sided reporting on the most contested conflicts of our time, and now positioned by law to be placed ahead of every independent voice on every major platform in the country.
Put this alongside the under-16s ban and the pattern stops looking like coincidence. One policy restricts what young people can access. The other restructures what everyone sees first, adults included, engineering visibility in favour of the state broadcaster and against the independent platforms where this
government’s record, on Belfast, on Makerfield, on the asylum backlog and on every other documented failure, gets challenged daily by people it cannot easily silence. Bluesky escaped the social media ban despite its own documented child safety failures. The BBC gets promoted despite a documented record of
fabrication. Both decisions share the same logic. Visibility for institutions the government finds comfortable. Restriction for the platforms where it does not.
Lord Young of Acton, the human rights lawyer who founded the Free Speech Union, put it with the right amount of contempt. The Prime Minister has apparently decided that censoring social media should be his legacy, which is strange territory for a former human rights lawyer to choose. It is strange only if you assume the goal was ever free expression rather than managed expression. Nothing in this government’s conduct this month supports that assumption.
A government that needs to legislate prominence for its preferred broadcaster is not protecting the public from disinformation. It is admitting that its preferred broadcaster cannot earn that prominence on the evidence of its own reporting, and has decided to mandate by law what trust no longer provides voluntarily. That is not journalism policy. It is state media privilege written into platform regulation, arriving in the same fortnight as a ban on what sixteen year olds may read, from a government that is rapidly running out of ways to disguise what it is actually doing.
“The BBC spliced together two separate parts of a Donald Trump speech, delivered an hour apart, to make it appear he had directly told his supporters to march on the Capitol and fight”
On the BBC ?
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/terror-and-security/thousands-flee-south-africa-ahead-anti-foreigner-ultimatum/
… thought not
It’s been on their BBC for several days. Now in the World news section, was on the front page on Wednesday.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg740l2jpr0o
Genuinely surprised…!
My BiL has a gas tumble dryer – that’ll be a 3 year stretch.
On the basis that the establishment’s narrative is that the UK has a debt of an unknown amount to unknown persons for the slave trade, how long will it be before we have to pay reparations to Germany for engaging in the second world war (oh and at the same time you could take Churchill off the one bank note that has so little value, that the changes are unlikely to prevent any fraud)
Article in The Guardian re the alleged bombing of an Iranian school with lots of children killed.
In the article they run a piece of video showing the interior of a school classroom with lines of desks. On the left hand side of the scene the desks and benches can be seen to be pristine clean, as the camera pans right the right hand row of desks have large pieces of what looks like shattered concrete lying on the desks in a very orderly fashion. However the surrounding walls are intact and clean so where could this mystery concrete debris have come from? The ceiling is unlikely to be constructed with 3 inch thick concrete, more usually thin plaster, and surely an explosion displacing concrete would surely scatter some timber, roof joists etc? There is no evidence in the video of any debris other that the suspicious chunks of concrete..
To me, it looks as if it has been carefully placed to fit the narrative. The desks and benches in the room, including the ones with debris are also shown in perfect rows despite being pretty flimsy looking, a large violent explosion would have scattered them across the room.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/21/iran-school-bombing-minab-fears-trump-hegseth-bury-truth-investigation-findings
I would deduce that the video has been faked by Iranian actors to implicate and smear the US and I wonder why the investigative powers of the Guardian journalists or their agents involved fail to notice any of this?
Wasn’t the bombing on the weekend, Iranian schoolchildren attend Monday to Friday only?
Did they mention how the school used to be the headquarters for the missile base and the American intelligence was out of date ?.
No – thought not.
‘The two-story concrete building originally served as the command headquarters for the Seyyed al-Shohada Asif Missile Brigade of the IRGC Navy.’
You won’t see that on the BBC. AI tried to lie to me to say it was when it wasn’t:
‘You are entirely correct to call that out—the BBC did not report that the building was a command headquarters. That specific detail comes from broader military and legal analyses of the incident, not the BBC’s reporting’
Has he gone yet?
you wish …..
I’m pretty confident Bodybags will have you quickly thinking of the Starmer good old days – he can only shuffle the pack of dud cards….
I wonder what the Khant is up to….
Fear, Fear, Fear , Warning, Warning , Warning .
” Extreme heat warning expanded as 37C heatwave approaches UK”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/articles/cp8lye61jk6o
Its COVID all over again. What next, ‘Stay indoors’ and ‘wear a hat’ !
So when do people think Starmer will resign ?.
I’m 50/50. Everything points to him going tomorrow. It’s his last chance to salvage any perception of doing the honourable thing at all.
But that means nothing to this creature. I still think he might stay on and fight to stay. He is utterly deluded. It will mean the end of all his EU trips and ‘coalition of the willing’ meetings and they are what he lives for.
Plus there is a good chance he will employ a scorched earth policy on his way out and sabotage everything he can for Bodybags.
This week is going to be a cracker. Please hold on Two-Tier. I don’t want it to end quickly. I want to see you humiliate yourself thoroughly before you disappear in disgrace.
The bBC is pre-occupied with the importance of equality yet they are strangely silent now that the Labour Party are lining up another white male leader. Of course the bBC understand the Labour Party, they are one and the same, and they get a free pass. Reform are not so lucky, apparently they are anti-female. The Conservatives; well the bBC cannot comment because it is an off-topic subject, because we know that Conservatives are both racist and sexist. It is lucky that we have such discerning bBC narrativists to bring us what we need to hear.
Dear Keir,
In light of your possible resignation I would like to point out a non-comprehensive legacy list showing only a few of your achievements.
1. ‘Smashing the gangs’.
2. The over-taxing of businesses
3. Trying to give away the Chagos Islands and making the tax- payer pay for it.
4. Ignoring the grooming gangs, and doing nothing for the victims.
5. Ignoring the genuine concerns of much of the electorate and pushing a ‘far-right’ label on anyone who would raise concerns relating to unchecked and illegal immigration.
6. Not answering any questions during prime ministers QT in house of commons.
7. Souring the UK – US relationship.
8. Attack on pensioners, veterans, farmers………….. etc.
9. Pushing to give 16 year olds the vote.
10. Backing Net-Zero despite the the economic destruction of Industries and many businesses, and the loss of future job prospectives for young people.
I assume you will be looking for a role in the EU relating to EU and International Law. On the ‘Kinnock’ Gravy Train. Hopefully Lord Ali will be giving you and the Mrs some leaving presents (maybe more new glasses for you and more knickers for the Mrs).
Hope you still get some quality time with Andy, Mandy, Tony B, Ang, Ed Millipede and the labour master mind.
PS: You could demonstrate that you are charitable at heart by taking in 1 or 2 migrants like Yvette said you would.
Now that President Trump has chimed in saying TTK is going to- maybe TTK will be more inclined to hang on …. But if he goes – I’d do anything to see him blub ….
The number 10 podium beckons ….
… and then there’s TTA….
When people mention that Burnham got a huge vote in Makerfield they don’t seem to come out with one big statistic.
They say it’s a vote to get rid of TTK but I think that’s only part of it.
The greens got 308 votes and the libdems also got an unreaslistic low vote of 163 which looks like tactical voting to me.
The Labour vote plus the greens and the libdems beat Reform but if it wasn’t for this tactical voting to keep Reform out maybe the 35% votes would have been enough.
If the greens and libdems (national poll of polls have them at 15% and 13%) had their 2 x 10%+ votes Reform probably would have won.
And that’s not taking Restore 6.8% into consideration.
Has anyone on here heard any commentator mentioning the tiny green/libdem vote and said they moved to Labour for this by election.
They only seem to be saying it was to get rid of TTK.
Starmer Plans to Force everyone in the World to “Trust the BBC”. The BBC lead Trusted News Initiative (TNI) will use Censorship of the Truth and Socialist Propaganda to cover-up the crimes of the British State. The British government will give itself emergency powers, with sweeping state surveillance and control of the British people using behavioural science to brainwash the British people to conform to the behaviours required by the state. “Truth is Misinformation, Freedom is Slavery and Diversity is our Strength”: https://dailysceptic.org/2026/06/21/starmer-plans-to-force-social-media-giants-to-prioritise-bbc-content/
The BBC banned these ten comments for spreading misinformation, disinformation and malinformation:
(1) Sir Keir Starmer wants social media to support trusted media like the BBC. I’m not sure which is funnier the BBC being called trusted or Starmer being called Sir.
(2) BBC is disinformation. It should be remembered that George Orwell models his book 1984 on the way the BBC operates.
(3) The BBC is trusted alright… to be most biased, unreliable, disseminators of Leftard propaganda in the entire United Kingdom!
(4) You mean the BBC? The misinformation leaders who knowingly altered an interview with President Trump and now gets to pay millions in libel punishment??? Good idea Starmer
(5) Orwell warned us of this – BBC = BIG BROTHER COMMUNIST
(6) Hey limeys, 1984 was a warning, not an operating manual for the fascist elites.
(7) This is left wing propaganda and everyone knows it. Britain is no longer a democratic or free country.
(8) Put simply, the Marxist/Globalists intend to suppress, repress or burden any media that is not government controlled. How Soviet of them.
(9) Good thing people of vision threw tea into the Boston Harbor a long time ago which led to our establishment of freedom of speech as a fundamental right.
(10) Madame Starmer only wants state controlled media, sorta like Stalin and Pravda.
Elon Musk reposted: ‘X’ is the #1 news app in the UK. This is exactly why the BBC, The Telegraph and other UK legacy media keep pushing negative fake attacks on Elon Musk. They are getting destroyed in the rankings. The British public has rejected them. Legacy media is finished: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2067501678903832812
I know I’m getting advanced in years and I’m worried I might be getting Dementia.
When I watch the news on BBC I’m sure I see things that can’t be true.
Kier Starmer is Prime Minister.
David Lammy is deputy prime Minister of the United Kingdom. Lord chancellor and Secretary of state for Justice.
Rachel Reeves is the Chancellor of the Exchequer.
Yvette Cooper is the Foreign secretary.
Shabana Mahmood is the Home Secretary.
ED. Miliband is the Energy Secretary.
Lisa Nandy is the Culture Secretary.
It looks like:
Jeremy Corbin, Angela Rayner, John Mcdonnell and many more are waiting in the wings for Andy Burnham to be Prime Minister. A man that the Labour Party didn’t even want as an MP.
I must see my Doctor, if I can get an appointment.
Please tell me this isn’t true.
Kinell – it’s okay you’re not getting dementia – other wise you’d have posted the same thing twice . Having gone through dementia as a carer ( like so many ) – the ‘memory clinic ‘ where you get assessed for dementia is a gift for anyone who does crosswords …
I’ve realised who TTA will have as chancellor – if not mad ed – it’s that ‘Torsten bell ‘ who has a hatred for old people and can’t wait to get rid of the triple lock and start up pensioners having fights at food banks ….
The financial commentators are saying watch the bond yield on Monday – see if they can push it back up to 5% … – the amount of tax money now being spent on servicing the the existing debt is … obscene ….
An ‘emergency budget ‘ to put up more taxes right now … maybe …
“Stop the boats”, we have no idea of who is coming in !…
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckg0d6y888zo
The MOD needs to get involved now .
Phew .. we really need the complete clot out of office ASAP.
Crewkerne AI really doesn’t get close to the stupid evasions he spouts all the effing time
Murkey Micks and Kier Starmer dark money….
v.v. dodgy stuff
Time for a new Thread – and PM maybe … with more of the same Marxist repression …