How much of the Truth about the killing of Ann Widdecombe will we get? Or will it be the usual legal shield to prevent ‘speculation ‘. The Left has certainly soiled itself with pitiful heartless comments about this lady .
Start the Week 13th July 2026
Bookmark the permalink.
OK : this has been bothering me for a while now:
US insists Strait of Hormuz is open as it exchanges strikes with Iran
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj9gkpp0dkeo
‘The US insists the Strait of Hormuz is open, despite Iran saying it has closed the waterway amid renewed strikes.’
Here’s the truth of what Iran have done after I asked AI:
‘No, Iran has no legal right to close the Omani part of the Strait of Hormuz, nor does Oman itself have the right to close it. The southern side of the strait is completely under Oman’s sovereign territorial waters, making any unilateral military closure or enforcement by Iran an illegal invasion of Oman’s territory and a breach of international maritime law.’
Why does the BBC never mention this ?. It is a key point for the whole situation. Why aren;t governments condemning what Iran are doing here and thus send forces to aid the USA to open it for shipping ?.
And why aren’t the International community using this as a reason to join in to keep Hormuz open ?. After all, Iran directly declared they want to crash the global economy. They are all totally silent.
From AI:
‘You are entirely right: framing the crisis simply as “Iran closes the Strait” without mentioning Oman’s sovereign waters can accidentally imply that Iran has a legal right to do so or that the entire area belongs to them. Leaving out that context sanitizes a major element of the crisis: that any total closure or enforcement across the entire strait requires violating a peaceful neighbor’s borders and breaking international law’
‘it sanitizes the illegal nature of Iran’s actions and obscures the vital role that Omani sovereignty plays in keeping the global economy moving.’
Can it really be because they hate Trump so much that they want to make Iran look like innocent victims ?.
I was sent a tic tok by one of a small Whattsap group, of baby Biden and baby Trump. The implication was that a mad baby Trump had attacked Iran again without reason. No mention of the Iranian attack on a ship in Hormuz. I debated whether to respond pointing out that Iran was the initiator. I didn’t. The other ladies are very much to the traditional Right. But sometimes they send these anti-Trump memes and videos. Set me thinking who makes these things? They could well be sponsored by Democrats, or is it the Russians or even the Chinese. Had I responded it would have shown me as sort of person who can’t enjoy a joke. I am growing ever more suspicious that these things are far more sinister that they first appear.
About time Trump grew a pair and just did the job on Iran and turn off the lights….they’re attacking US supply lines now….bomb them back to the stone age….and he’s going to have to put large numbers of troops on the ground even if in raiding capacity rather than occupying….to wipe out the small boats[lol…] and drone launchers.
Finish it and stop allowing Iran to humiliate the US.
Nigel Farage believes it was a premeditated act so expect the left wing authorities to do all they can to attack him as a conspiracy theorist
Watch how quickly they charge the suspect. Once they do that, the media are not allowed to report anything at all except what the police or a court tell them. We have the strictest rules in the world to muzzle the press. As Tommy Robinson found out.
Then set the trial date for 18 months away and it will all be forgotten by the time we are allowed to know what really happened.
Times Radio already attacking him as ‘exploiting Ann Widdecombe’s death for political purposes’…or he may just be joining the dots…why would someone travel hundreds of miles to her home…the killer must have researched her to find her home…unless it’s pure chance and he’s a long range roving burglar.
The man arrested for Ann Widecombe’s murder is non terrorist and non political as the Police maintain. Therefore the only other explanation he must be a lone wolf nutter. However he went to the extreme actions of travelling 300 miles and murdering her. Why didn’t he murder some random person nearby or travel 300 miles to some other remote spot in the UK and kill some random person there?
The explanation, Ann wasn’t some random person, he obviously chose to travel 300 miles and chose to murder her. There must be some motivation to do that which I would suggest is her prominence in Political life, her conservative views. We are in a situation where holding conservative opinions and being a member of a right wing political party, ie Reform, is considered actionable. It is therefore must be a political murder and by extension, terrorism. What else could it be?
I used to believe everything the police said. Then there was Southport and the defence of Gaza marches. My trust has gone.
Deborah, I too used to be a staunch supporter of the police who I thought did a very difficult job under very difficult circumstances.
Last week I parked in a supermarket car park and when I came out, a police car was in the nearest slot and a typically butch looking policewoman with her hair in tight-plaited ponytails was getting into the drivers seat.
It was at that point that I realised I do not trust the police at all in the UK now. I no longer think they are there to protect me. It was a significant moment.
SpaceX To Launch Starship For Its 13th Time This Week!
Comment “THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE….their massive slave institution. Why does no one demand apologies and reparations from the Turks?????”
Comment “David Lammy, Lenny Henry! Are you listening?”
The TRUTH About Slavery in Africa and Islam – And Why You Never Hear About It
The BBC is not the only media organisation hoping hard that the murder of Ann Widdecombe is not political because of course both organisations have spent a great deal of time and effort in trying to demonise Reform and Farage portraying them as racist Nazis and thus maybe, just maybe, have incited someone to attack a senior Reform politician.
Even today Times is trying to attack Farage by saying he is politicising the death of Ann Widdecombe by suggesting it seemed planned….if anyone is politicising this it is the Times which has spent the last weeks on a savage and relentless drive to smear Reform and Farage with the intent of destroying them as a Party.
Prima facie Farage is right given the known facts…the arrested suspect lived hundreds of miles from Widdecombe and had nothing to do with her…thus you might think he travelled down there especially to see her for whatever reason….must have researched her to find where she lives.
Prima facie one could suspect that the inflammatory and provocative accusations coming from the Times provoked an individual to take action of their own against a high profile Reform politician.
Pretty sure Times headsheds are sweating it now….blood could be on their hands.
We all await the investigation of course…may well just be some very odd story and pure chance that Ann Widdecombe ended up as a victim.
Times’ maths not up to much…Fraser Nelson, often dragged in to chuck mud at Farage, claimed that it was very dodgy that Farage had invested £200,000 in Crypto…just don’t know where he got the money…yes he got £1 million from ‘Celebrity’ but that wouldn’t give you £200,000 to invest in crypto!
Hmmm…not sure but I reckon £1 million is a lot more than £200,000.
Oh and yeah…£5 million donated to Farage…I mean…that’s unprecedented in our political system, it changes everything!
Hmmm…didn’t at least 3 individual donors give £5 million pounds each to Labour? [And isn’t a foreign billionaire news paper baron giving Labour massive media support attacking its most dangerous rival ie Reform dodgy foreign founding undermining our democracy?…please declare that Times]
If there isn’t a rule in Ofcom that says media organisations should not conduct highly political campaigns against a particular Party with the sinister intent to destroy that Party and thus basically destroy the democratic system in this country there should be.
How can the police say it was not politically motivated. It must have been