There has to come a point where ordinary citizens realise fully that they are being controlled by despicable agents of an elusive one world order who simply do not wish to entertain the idea that evil sections of people on this planet are diabolically dangerous and need to be dealt with with the utmost vigour. It goes against their idea of a melting pot society controlled by a gaggle of the great and good in Davos etc. Hence any call to retribution against the usual obscene offenders is silenced by these ghouls in the name of one world order.
However the general population who have to swallow this lying guff time after time and pay the consequences often with lives will inevitably become more angered by the deceit forced upon them.
What happens after that point can only be imagined but in my view it is an inevitable outcome and it won’t be pretty!
Remember the cuases for the French Revolution… There are similar parallels building up here.
Anarcho-tyranny in full swing, with a side order of wholesale population replacement.
Will the public wake up to it?
I think many in the population don’t or wouldn’t even care, they include the huge public sector, non job workers, higher rate incapacity benefits / PIP recipients. Homeowners sitting on massive equity who image they’ll sell up and move out just in time.
That’s half the population, throw in 20 % immigrants
Unfortunately that doesn’t leave many left to carry the fight…
What happened to the wonderful @RNLI? Answer, it was captured by the Globalist Left. Meet Janet Legrand, ex-globalist lawyer and Chair of the RNLI since January 2023. Legrand is yet another one of those identi-kit radical left women who plague the West. pic.twitter.com/kMhuVsTcar
“Her former roles include Chair of the Trustee Board of The Children’s Society, Deputy Chair of Council at City, University of London, Deputy Chair of the Marshall Aid Commemoration Commission, Director at the Leadership Foundation for Higher Education, external member of the Audit Committee at The University of Cambridge and founding member of the Board of PRIME, the legal profession’s social mobility alliance.”
TOMORROW, under subpoena, I will be asking Anthony Fauci a number of questions surrounding gain-of-function research, the COVID cover-up, and his preemptive pardon.
Last night I was having a watch of BBC2’s quiz night.
On University Challenge we had our first tranny of the season, turning out for University College Oxford. All St John’s College Cambridge could manage was a gay man with flamboyant earrings and nail varnish. They really must do better.
Then on Only Connect one team consisted of three extravagantly gay Liverpudlians. Sadly they lost to a team of squares, but they will be back.
The British government hid this data for years. Now it is out.
79% of everyone arrested for theft on British railways was a foreigner. 40% of all arrests. 37% of sexual offenses. 36% of violent crimes. All foreign nationals.
They knew exactly what the consequences of their immigration policy were. They just never told you.”
On the previous thread I drew attention to BBC local Radio withholding the names of the ethnic alleged murderers of a local white man. I have to report that by about mid afternoon the BBC were naming them but well after those names were readily available. From the alleged involvement of other people in the attack it appears this is an Asian gang murder.
For the BBC not to keep this important news up to date is grossly offensive to the family and memory of the murdered man. I suggest it is a deliberate lie by omission by the BBC, totally dishonest.
Flotsam – if we assume that the BBC editorial policy is to minimise the sins of invaders then the initial omission works for them – but when the facts get too big they have to publish – and then bury in ‘regional ‘ – and find something to distract the reader …
Reading this below – i some how think Robin aitken is not a fan of …. Subha Nagalakshmi Munchetty-Chendriah
STARTS So Naga Munchetty’s reign on BBC Breakfast is coming to an end, and it’s a reign that has never been far from scandal. Take a brief excursion back through the headlines and there’s plenty to choose from.
There was the time she blurted out that Donald Trump was a “racist” (and it was decreed by the Executive Complaints Unit that she breached the Corporation’s guidelines); there was the time she started sniggering because Robert Jenrick had positioned himself for interview in front of an outsize Union flag; there was the awkward, ill-judged interview with national treasure Sir David Attenborough in which she tried to get him to unburden himself of some royal gossip (needless to say, the Companion of Honour kept shtum, gave her short shrift and the interview ended rather abruptly).
Viewed objectively, none of these “scandals” amount to very much, but if you are a front-line TV presenter, no slight mishap, no lapse is ever going to be overlooked. And in Munchetty’s case, there was another factor at work. In 2025, the BBC announced that it was mounting an “investigation” into allegations of bullying by the Breakfast presenter. It’s the kind of charge that has spelt career death for many a good man and woman in recent years, and though eventually she was cleared of wrongdoing, it can’t have been very easy for her.
For she must have had enemies on the programme. I can’t see any other explanation for how some of the allegations – to which Munchetty has never deigned to respond – made it into the press. One of the leaked stories was about her morning toast. As the Breakfast presenter, Munchetty would have to arrive at an ungodly, early hour and needed a bit of sustenance; and clearly she had exacting standards, or so the story goes. As one of her erstwhile colleagues (who else could it have been?) commented anonymously about her toast: “It needed to be a little bit burnt, but not too much. And if you didn’t get it right, she would never shout at you, but she would act as if it was a really stupid mistake to make… instead she would be like, ‘Oh they can’t get the toast right; they can’t do anything.’” Another story (in The Sun) said she threw a tantrum about how her Marmite was spread and that her porridge was too hot. She never responded to that either.
Storms in a TV teacup? Maybe so, and I have a smidgen of sympathy. The men and women who sit broiling under the studio lights, adopting a calm demeanour, everyone’s friend at six in the morning – that’s not an easy act to pull off. And it is an act: it’s positively unnatural to be that cheerful, calm and informed when the rest of us are tumbling, bleary-eyed, out of bed. That’s a very stressful thing to do, so perhaps being a bit prima-donna-ish is forgivable.
I’ve seen this sort of thing at close quarters; many years ago, I was a reporter on Breakfast News and the presenters had their quirks. There was one, who shall be nameless, who I once saw being very rude to a waitress after a stressful outside broadcast; it wasn’t nice to witness, but given they can never really let themselves go when they’re on air, I suspect it all comes out when the red light goes off. Whoever happens to be standing nearby sometimes catches it in the neck. It doesn’t go for all presenters; I never saw Bill Turnbull, who was a good mate, behave with anything other than politeness and consideration.
And what of the programme Munchetty leaves behind (for the punishing breakfast slot on Radio 5 Live)? I cannot see that she is any great loss. For one thing, her demeanour always struck me as slightly too chilly for the Breakfast presenter’s chair. Going back a long way, to the programme’s early days, and the presenters included Frank Bough (the most super-relaxed TV personality, though later disgraced by revelations of visiting prostitutes, cocaine use and sex dungeons). No viewer need fear being unduly alarmed when Frank was in the chair – he would have announced the End of the World with reassuring matiness.
And there was the ill-fated Jill Dando with her girl-next-door ordinariness. That wasn’t a put-on – Jill really was just as nice off-air as she seemed on the telly. But Munchetty never quite mastered that vibe; a bit too sharp, a bit too chippy, she brought an edge to her performance that never quite seemed right. She had a slight hauteur about her and perhaps it was that quality that her anonymous colleagues found irksome; people who make it clear they don’t suffer fools are rarely popular. ENDS
Btw – I remain proud that I was accused of racism by name naga by her real name – which is
Subha Nagalakshmi Munchetty-Chendriah
I prefer to call a spade a spade – as it were..
Btw – in the previous comment I reported that Subha Nagalakshmi Munchetty-Chendriah was leaving the BBC – in fact Subha Nagalakshmi Munchetty-Chendriah is getting a job on R5 .. it will be the Subha Nagalakshmi Munchetty-Chendriah show …
tomoAug 23, 23:23 Start the Week 24th August 2026 BBC is even more poisonous and toxic than any of the social media organisations true A black academic who’s invisible…
tomoAug 23, 22:07 Weekend 22nd August 2026 Much as I enjoy a conspiracy theory – sometimes you have to wonder why people ignore evidence…. It would imho…
pugnaziousAug 23, 21:58 Start the Week 24th August 2026 ‘Meta has been hit with successive losses in court over how its platforms have targeted and harmed young users, but…
DeborahAug 23, 21:49 Start the Week 24th August 2026 I hope everyone is well. I do hope that for everyone here but have you noticed how all communications from…
pugnaziousAug 23, 21:39 Start the Week 24th August 2026 They get madder and madder when they leave….loose cannons when employed by the BBC or other media and when they…
Up2snuffAug 23, 21:12 Start the Week 24th August 2026 Here am I, send me to the top of this Thread. The BBC are wasteful on salaries, the BBC are…
Fedup2Aug 23, 20:44 Weekend 22nd August 2026 Tomo – thanks for putting that up – in relation to your question about the UK judiciary – the attack…
tomoAug 23, 20:08 Weekend 22nd August 2026 https://youtu.be/nnXOEwiDK_s Do we have a wave of UK judges that are primarily activists? – or are they just well remunerated…
pugnaziousAug 23, 19:52 Weekend 22nd August 2026 How border control works….though you could just lock the door…simple…. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/t1JZqK67a0E
There has to come a point where ordinary citizens realise fully that they are being controlled by despicable agents of an elusive one world order who simply do not wish to entertain the idea that evil sections of people on this planet are diabolically dangerous and need to be dealt with with the utmost vigour. It goes against their idea of a melting pot society controlled by a gaggle of the great and good in Davos etc. Hence any call to retribution against the usual obscene offenders is silenced by these ghouls in the name of one world order.
However the general population who have to swallow this lying guff time after time and pay the consequences often with lives will inevitably become more angered by the deceit forced upon them.
What happens after that point can only be imagined but in my view it is an inevitable outcome and it won’t be pretty!
Remember the cuases for the French Revolution… There are similar parallels building up here.
Anarcho-tyranny in full swing, with a side order of wholesale population replacement.
Will the public wake up to it?
I think many in the population don’t or wouldn’t even care, they include the huge public sector, non job workers, higher rate incapacity benefits / PIP recipients. Homeowners sitting on massive equity who image they’ll sell up and move out just in time.
That’s half the population, throw in 20 % immigrants
Unfortunately that doesn’t leave many left to carry the fight…
Is that her happy face. Looks like she just sniffed something unpleasant- like an invader her organisation is importing..
“Her former roles include Chair of the Trustee Board of The Children’s Society, Deputy Chair of Council at City, University of London, Deputy Chair of the Marshall Aid Commemoration Commission, Director at the Leadership Foundation for Higher Education, external member of the Audit Committee at The University of Cambridge and founding member of the Board of PRIME, the legal profession’s social mobility alliance.”
social mobility alliance????
https://rnli.org/about-us/how-the-rnli-is-run/our-trustees/janet-legrand
Somehow I can’t see her in a force 8 gale.
Better than Trump vegetable?
Last night I was having a watch of BBC2’s quiz night.
On University Challenge we had our first tranny of the season, turning out for University College Oxford. All St John’s College Cambridge could manage was a gay man with flamboyant earrings and nail varnish. They really must do better.
Then on Only Connect one team consisted of three extravagantly gay Liverpudlians. Sadly they lost to a team of squares, but they will be back.
Just another average Monday night on BBC2.
“Mees Wynants
@MeesWynants
The British government hid this data for years. Now it is out.
79% of everyone arrested for theft on British railways was a foreigner. 40% of all arrests. 37% of sexual offenses. 36% of violent crimes. All foreign nationals.
They knew exactly what the consequences of their immigration policy were. They just never told you.”
On the previous thread I drew attention to BBC local Radio withholding the names of the ethnic alleged murderers of a local white man. I have to report that by about mid afternoon the BBC were naming them but well after those names were readily available. From the alleged involvement of other people in the attack it appears this is an Asian gang murder.
For the BBC not to keep this important news up to date is grossly offensive to the family and memory of the murdered man. I suggest it is a deliberate lie by omission by the BBC, totally dishonest.
Flotsam – if we assume that the BBC editorial policy is to minimise the sins of invaders then the initial omission works for them – but when the facts get too big they have to publish – and then bury in ‘regional ‘ – and find something to distract the reader …
Reading this below – i some how think Robin aitken is not a fan of …. Subha Nagalakshmi Munchetty-Chendriah
STARTS So Naga Munchetty’s reign on BBC Breakfast is coming to an end, and it’s a reign that has never been far from scandal. Take a brief excursion back through the headlines and there’s plenty to choose from.
There was the time she blurted out that Donald Trump was a “racist” (and it was decreed by the Executive Complaints Unit that she breached the Corporation’s guidelines); there was the time she started sniggering because Robert Jenrick had positioned himself for interview in front of an outsize Union flag; there was the awkward, ill-judged interview with national treasure Sir David Attenborough in which she tried to get him to unburden himself of some royal gossip (needless to say, the Companion of Honour kept shtum, gave her short shrift and the interview ended rather abruptly).
Viewed objectively, none of these “scandals” amount to very much, but if you are a front-line TV presenter, no slight mishap, no lapse is ever going to be overlooked. And in Munchetty’s case, there was another factor at work. In 2025, the BBC announced that it was mounting an “investigation” into allegations of bullying by the Breakfast presenter. It’s the kind of charge that has spelt career death for many a good man and woman in recent years, and though eventually she was cleared of wrongdoing, it can’t have been very easy for her.
For she must have had enemies on the programme. I can’t see any other explanation for how some of the allegations – to which Munchetty has never deigned to respond – made it into the press. One of the leaked stories was about her morning toast. As the Breakfast presenter, Munchetty would have to arrive at an ungodly, early hour and needed a bit of sustenance; and clearly she had exacting standards, or so the story goes. As one of her erstwhile colleagues (who else could it have been?) commented anonymously about her toast: “It needed to be a little bit burnt, but not too much. And if you didn’t get it right, she would never shout at you, but she would act as if it was a really stupid mistake to make… instead she would be like, ‘Oh they can’t get the toast right; they can’t do anything.’” Another story (in The Sun) said she threw a tantrum about how her Marmite was spread and that her porridge was too hot. She never responded to that either.
Storms in a TV teacup? Maybe so, and I have a smidgen of sympathy. The men and women who sit broiling under the studio lights, adopting a calm demeanour, everyone’s friend at six in the morning – that’s not an easy act to pull off. And it is an act: it’s positively unnatural to be that cheerful, calm and informed when the rest of us are tumbling, bleary-eyed, out of bed. That’s a very stressful thing to do, so perhaps being a bit prima-donna-ish is forgivable.
I’ve seen this sort of thing at close quarters; many years ago, I was a reporter on Breakfast News and the presenters had their quirks. There was one, who shall be nameless, who I once saw being very rude to a waitress after a stressful outside broadcast; it wasn’t nice to witness, but given they can never really let themselves go when they’re on air, I suspect it all comes out when the red light goes off. Whoever happens to be standing nearby sometimes catches it in the neck. It doesn’t go for all presenters; I never saw Bill Turnbull, who was a good mate, behave with anything other than politeness and consideration.
And what of the programme Munchetty leaves behind (for the punishing breakfast slot on Radio 5 Live)? I cannot see that she is any great loss. For one thing, her demeanour always struck me as slightly too chilly for the Breakfast presenter’s chair. Going back a long way, to the programme’s early days, and the presenters included Frank Bough (the most super-relaxed TV personality, though later disgraced by revelations of visiting prostitutes, cocaine use and sex dungeons). No viewer need fear being unduly alarmed when Frank was in the chair – he would have announced the End of the World with reassuring matiness.
And there was the ill-fated Jill Dando with her girl-next-door ordinariness. That wasn’t a put-on – Jill really was just as nice off-air as she seemed on the telly. But Munchetty never quite mastered that vibe; a bit too sharp, a bit too chippy, she brought an edge to her performance that never quite seemed right. She had a slight hauteur about her and perhaps it was that quality that her anonymous colleagues found irksome; people who make it clear they don’t suffer fools are rarely popular. ENDS
Btw – I remain proud that I was accused of racism by name naga by her real name – which is
Subha Nagalakshmi Munchetty-Chendriah
I prefer to call a spade a spade – as it were..
Btw – in the previous comment I reported that Subha Nagalakshmi Munchetty-Chendriah was leaving the BBC – in fact Subha Nagalakshmi Munchetty-Chendriah is getting a job on R5 .. it will be the Subha Nagalakshmi Munchetty-Chendriah show …