TRUST?

A logo for the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is seen at its Broadcasting House  in central LondonWell then, did you see the claim that support for the BBC has risen in the last five years with almost four out of five people believing it is an institution to be proud of? How interesting. I wonder who commissioned the poll? ICM/Guardian. I see, well, that’s as impartial as you get, right? Asked if the BBC was trustworthy, almost seven in 10 of the 1,001 adults questioned said yes, up from six in 10.

OK – let’s produce our own poll, and let’s see if we can get more than ICM’s 1001 adults answering.

Churnalism

You’d think a self-styled news organisation might want to expose the mechanisms by which governments fund arms-length organisations to “pressure” them – and the public – into following some previously-decided agenda.

Not so.

Scottish households throw away a billion pounds worth of food a year, according to new report into eating habits. The Waste and Resources Programme ( WRAP) report revealed the most common discarded items were fruit and vegetables, milk and bread. Researchers examined waste from more than 1,000 homes and found that one in seven items was still in its packaging. Disposing of food waste costs councils an estimated £85m each year. The report found that Scottish households throw out 570,000 tonnes of food and drink each year. This translated to an annnual loss to the average household of £430.

I would love to see the methodologies and sampling techniques which produce these statistics. Is the average Scottish household really binning £8 worth of food every week ? Are one in seven items of packaged food really chucked ? I think not.

Commenting on the report, Environment Secretary Richard Lochhead said: “I’m sure most people would agree that it’s shocking to think that society needlessly wastes £1bn of food each year in Scotland.

“Food waste is one of the many issues currently being addressed in the government’s draft Zero Waste Plan, which I would urge people to have their say on.”

Well, you would say that, wouldn’t you – given that you paid them to say it ?

I would avoid clicking on this link (pdf – WRAPs “business plan”) unless you suffer from insomnia, but suffice it to say that every penny of the £62 million that WRAP, a not-for-profit limited company, get through each year in producing dodgy reports, comes out of the taxpayer’s pocket. Indeed the most interesting thing about them is the fact that retiring chairman Vic Cocker is the brother of rock singer Joe.

Dr Nicki Souter, Waste Aware Scotland campaign manager, added: “This report being so detailed truly shows the public how much food is currently being wasted in Scotland.”

The Waste and Resources Programme is 100% publicly funded, what of Waste Aware Scotland ? Again, this link is even more tedious (they have four workstreams and eight matrices, you’ll be pleased to know – if only they were producing something other than verbiage, strategies, reports and seminars), but I can tell you that they are a taxpayer-funded fake charity, if somewhat leery of telling us exactly how deep in our pockets their hands reach (they “will draw down funding on a monthly basis by submitting the Scottish Government’s application for payment schedule“). As the Fake Charities site tells us :

“These charities are usually brought to our attention through interviews in the mainstream media (MSM) in which they support the position of the government that funds them”

The bad news is that :

SWAG (Scotland Waste Awareness Group) will continue to develop Waste Aware Business in partnership with CoSLA, CRNS, Envirowise Scotland, EST, NISP, Remade Scotland, Scottish businesses and retailers, WRAP and other partners as appropriate.

So many acronyms, so little time. It looks as though we’ll see plenty more Government press releases on the BBC ‘news’ site in the future.

IT’S TOMMIE THIS AND ALLAH THAT…

So, did you catch this gem on our much loved State Broadcaster? My heart bleeds for those poor Muslim Tommies who were so uniquely badly treated and let down by their colonial masters. I am SURE all those with military experience will recognise the firm reality portrayed by this BBC special. Yes? Is it any wonder Muslims have such angst?

Doff of the Trilby to the ASE!

BRITISH EURO JUDGE NEED NOT BE BRITISH…

Remarkable story here.

An advertisement for Britain’s judge on the European Court of Human Rights has
stated that the post does not need to be held by a British national. The advert for the £175,000 a-year position says the role is “not restricted to British nationals…” It has been published jointly by the Ministry of Justice and Foreign Office.

I note it adds that candidates must “demonstrate a close current connection with the United Kingdom and familiarity with one or more of its legal systems”. Like Sharia?

Thus far, the BBC has been unable to find any critics of this outrage!

OPEN THREAD…

So, what have we got? Bob Ainsworth loses one of his little helpers who resigns attacking government policy in Afghanistan; Another UK soldier has been killed in Afghanistan; Accusations from tribal elders in Afghanistan of vote rigging……..time to get out? And there was me thinking this was the good war, with Iraq being the bad war. Anyway, the floor is yours…!

Never Happened

Holocaust denial is in the news again.
Firstly, the one I prepared earlier, Hamas and the text books.
Secondly, Facebook’s policy of allowing free speech for Holocaust denial groups, arguably in contradiction to their policy of banning hate-speech.
Thirdly, the publication in the Spanish newspaper El Mundo, of a ‘major interview’ with David Irving, to balance the previous day’s interview with Avner Shalev, the chairman of Yad Vashem.

What’s this got to do with the BBC?
Don’t shout! A thread on fivelive……
Commenter “Cookie Cutter”on Harry’s place (2:39) says:

“a few years ago there was the “Iron Naz” incident[..] representation was made to BBC Management who saw the error of their ways and a whole slew of antisemitic posts were renewed with a supposed hot-line between BOD and BBC to alert the moderators. A BBC department head argued that it was free speech.
“If the moderators are the same today as there were then, then I happen to believe I know something about where the moderators are recruited from (based on the management of the moderating company) and these are not people sympathetic to Jewish and Israel issues, correction, not even neutral.[…] My guess is that the BBC moderators have turned-over staff since “Iron Naz” days and the current crew are taking complaints as mendacious. They can ban you if you complain too much.”

CHURCHILL – LIABILITY OR ASSET?

What can I say? On the day that 70 years ago saw this country go to war against Nazi Germany, the BBC chooses to run a discussion as to whether Sir Winston Churchill was “more of a liability than an asset”. Today @ 8.190am. I suppose that depends on which side you take – ours or the Germans?

DEATH PANELS IN THE UK

It’s funny but when Sarah Palin brought up the great dangers posed by Obamacare, using the term “death panels” to vividly describe possible outcomes, the BBC were quick to get stuck into her. Then, oddly enough, Today covers an item @ 7.45am (no link at time of writing this) in which a group of senior doctors who care for the terminally ill have written a letter in the Telegraph warning that some patients are dying prematurely because of new NHS guidelines in England. It seems to me that our own socialised healthcare system is all the warning the US needs, as Dan Hannan properly observed.

NHS MANIA

It was of course inevitable that Brown would reject the very sensible recommendations made to cut the NHS workforce by 10% over the next five years. (Personally, I would favour much deeper workforce cuts in this monolith but at least this would be a good start) His response is entirely political and not based in economic reality rather like his entire period when Chancellor. Earlier today the BBC dragged on NuLabour cohort Sir Gerry “We love the NHS” Robinson to discuss the issue and I thought he was fair enough agreeing that cuts could be made at both administration and clinical level, presumably not the result the BBC were looking for! So just after 8am, we had a discussion between Niall Dickson, chief executive of the health analysis charity the King’s Fund and Carl Emmerson, Deputy Director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies. Lots of BBC digs at Daniel Hannan during this item, by the way. And, of course, wealth distribution gets a favourable reaction.

What did you think of it?

COLOURBLIND

Just wanted to bring this comment to your attention from the Open Thread by George R. I did catch it earlier on the BBC and he is quite accurate in his assessment! The BBC just cannot accept that South Africa under the ANC is profoundly racist….


More BBC political bias on ‘racism’ as BBC supports South Africa’s ANC in its criticism of Canada in accepting a WHITE refugee from South Africa:

BBC report: (‘Africa’ page, not Canada page, which doesn’t exist, of course)-

“Canada SA refugee ruling ‘racist'”

[Extract]:

“South Africa’s ruling African National Congress has condemned as ‘racist’ a decision by Canada to grant a white South African man refugee status. “Brandon Huntley, 31, had told officials in Canada he could not return to South Africa after seven different attacks. “They included three stabbings, which he said he had suffered as a result of his skin colour.
“His lawyer said he was granted asylum because the South African authorities were unable to protect their citizens.”

The BBC does not recognise nor condemn ‘racist’ attacks on whites, apparently. Some reading for BBC on conditions in black South Africa: R.W. Johnson, “South Africa’s Brave New World” (Alen Lane.)